@CPH:
Quote:
For the fact that nobody ever was hurt physically by a Nano I think you make it sound so dramatic!
...All I can do is help preventig other incidents happening to prevent repeating such incidents. |
You beat me to the dramatics (fear mongers about Nano being the first) so I took the lesson from them and you...
Your help is appreciated (for goodness' sake, do not misinterpret this).
Quote:
What you fail to understand is that ranting is not getting anyone anywhere. How much ranting was done when the Union Carbide desaster happened? A hell of a lot. What was the result? Nothing. |
If ranting were not useful, there would never have been a single recall in history. But then, you saying this after nice doses of rants on Toyota and Mercedes (...I would never buy one...) is a little too hard to digest. And Union Carbide...actually not enough ranting took place, but I'll not debate this issue.
Quote:
Whatever you are coming up with you just prove my point, which you don't want to see. |
If you think so, you're welcome. I'm not out to prove anything. Just telling people to chill till some concrete facts about the burnt Nano emerge. Like everyone else, I too see what I want to see.
Quote:
Not a single person of over one billion people in India do know the exact cause of the fire. But everyone blames Tata from the word 'go'. |
Then deductive logic implies that I do not exist since I am one of the people in India and I don't blame Tata yet but I do exist so your statement is tagged false.
Quote:
What has consumer protection to do with Tata? Tata is not the government. If Tata has bodged your pressure leads to shooting yourself in the foot without consumer protection. Sort the consumer protection and any company bodging can be held at ransom. |
Everything. Public pressure and bad publicity is a very crude yet effective way of consumer protection which all businesses need to be careful of.
Quote:
I have seen enough investigations that were wound up in the way you describe and later it turned out that the conclusions were wrong, which led to more people dying. |
I do not recall describing any way of investigations. Timely investigations do not mean a slipshod job. Do NOT twist others' words, man. Discrediting others does not credit you.
Quote:
It took 2 years to figure out why the Air France Concorde had its fatal take off. Experts came to many conclusions. They had video evidence, they had a flight recorder, they had maintainance records, the planes wer regularly inspected, they had all the experience with wear and tear and the flaws of the construction. In many other aircraft incidents it is the same story. |
The Concorde is not the Nano.
Quote:
Again you are wrong. I am not telling people to not jump up and down. I am against false accusations! Jumping up and down on false accusations is wrong, immoral and self defeating. |
I bow to your being right...about what? What false accusation did I make here, telling people to chill and implying they were heated up? If so, guilty as charged LOL.
Quote:
Junp up and down when it is the right time. And then it should be done in an effective way. Or do you think that your jumping up and down is effective? You mentioned Bhopal and claim nothing has happened to the guilty ones. Why hasn't anythinjg changed since? Because your jumping up and down is predictable. Every authority and institution has got a plan 'in the drawer' to get out of this predictable situation. |
Not being the expert you are, our jumping is bound to be a little random and feebler as well. Guess every time
you jump, a Toyota or a Mercedes goes out of business.
Quote:
Sort the government to sort the laws and regulations. Jumping at the Nano won't change the manufacturers ways if they need changing. |
If only.
Quote:
You claim to care, but at the same time run Tata down on things you don't even know exactly what they are doing. This sounds to me like a headless chicken. Where is the agenda? You are trying to fight a battle and don't even know were it is! |
Trying to put words in my mouth again. The agenda is to CHILL a while and not spill attitude all over the thread calling people headless chickens.
Quote:
Ratan Tata can today close its factories and live very comfortable till th end of his life and never needs to bend a finger again for work and this would be the same several generations down. His future is a lot safer in this respect than any of ours. If you run down Tata you are bound to lose because it affects your economy. This is what we have to face. |
Thanks for reminding me of my economy, had forgotten it totally, I do respect Tata (for Steel/Indica/go/Nano). Again, putting words in my mouth would not serve anything.
Quote:
Unfortunately the ranters did not present facts, which certainly does not aid the project Nano. |
Well, neither did you.
Quote:
Concerns are constructive, ranting is not. |
Your concern concern, our concern rants. Your rants concern, our...oh rats. You've worn me down now.