Wow!!!

. The phenomenal number of responses leaves me a bit overwhelmed! Just proves that team-bhp & its members are in different class of their own. Thank you all for taking the time and effort to read through the posts. I would love to keep this thread as interactive as possible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tharian We have plenty of Jap cars mod'd reviews on the forum.
A 1.6 and a Ford, can't wait for the rest. |
Yes, strange isn't it? I have not seen any either. I find people working on Skodas, VWs and Hondas (other than a occasional Mondeo) but not so much on Fords. A little bit of mystery considering how good Ford engines are. Cosworth came to India offering crated Duratec engines but they finally left without any success (no doubt they were expensive). There is huge aftermarket industry for performance parts and tune ups internationally but no-one seems to be taking Ford seriously over here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aravind.anand I guess you meant the 1.3 Rocam? As Ikon had 1.3 Rocam, 1.6 Rocam and the 1.8 TDi , if my memory serves right... Fiesta came with a 1.4 DuraTec - the one you had bought. |
Yes. You are right. My bad.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayankk If this works out, I have no qualms getting my clunker down to Mumbai and spend some time. Don't know though how feasible it would be on a 130k run engine, which however, has been overhauled at 100k, and has a new lower half(?).
Waiting for the rest, the next dyno, and the costs as well....  |
There is no question of it not working out. It is only a matter of how it will happen and what paths the journey will take us down. Engine tuning is a science and to a certain degree an art that is very much dependent on the tuner's knowledge and experience. I have started this journey with the intention of learning along with the build. Failures will happen, I have no doubt about that, but each failure will open the door for new opportunities. This is a very high risk hobby and my advice to anyone who is risk averse, don't do it. Its expensive and is a bottomless pitt which will consume you once you start going down this road.
As for your car; it is feasible to work on a 130k engine. However, it will also be very expensive. The complete engine will need to be stripped down and blue printed. Every part will need to be examined and tested for metal fatigue. Your car may take stage 1 mods without any problems but beyond that it is a big unknown.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tharian Any ball park figure that you aim to achieve from the 97 whp?
The 97 whp figure was a  for me as well. Does that mean Ford quotes the power at wheels for their cars in their tech specs? |
We have a ball park figure in mind, but will share it with in subsequent posts. Do not want to spoil the suspense. And no, Ford does not quote power at wheel. In fact no-one does that anymore. All of them have adapted PS (horse strength in German) form as it is 'legally' mandatory in EU. PS is normally quoted at the crankshaft.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keroo1099 The mild piper along with twin carbs, and a freeflow was brilliant in my 1.0L gypsy, but the tuner had also put in stiffer valve springs to avoid valve bounce (it eventually spun to 8k). Don't see a mention of that in your writeup ? |
As mentioned in my post, Ford has designed a very robust valve train. The stock springs are strong enough to take additional load put on by stage 1 cams. The other reason for not replacing the springs is the rev limiter built into the ECU. The stock ECU rev limiter is set at 7,000 rpm. Therefore, there is no point in putting in springs unless we remove the rev limiter. Even with the rev limiter removed we estimate that the springs are good enough to hit 8,000 rpm.
Quote:
Originally Posted by akshay380 Also as many have pointed out regarding 97WHP, I am finding this figure as 69WHP in this for a Fiesta 1.6S. I guess both dynos mesaure power in completely different ways? |
Yes, I am aware of the results on Race Dynamics dyno. I cannot comment on the dyno as I have no personal knowledge on what type of Dyno they have (I am definitely not saying that their results are wrong). There are various types of dynos and there are various ways in which HP is calculated. There are host of variables and all of them have a significant role to play in the final results. A lot depends on the condition of the car. Another significant aspect that affects power output is height above sea level. The RD dyno is based in Bangalore which is a significant 980 meters above sea level (Mumbai is 14 meters). This aspect affects naturally aspirated engines more than turbo or supercharged ones. For this reason normally a correction standard such as SAE J1349 is used to correct the power curve. Anyway, the subject is too vast to deal with over here requires a dedicated thread of its own.
If you are interested in knowing more, here is an interesting article from Hot Rod magazine for further reading
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/...-dyno-testing/ Quote:
Originally Posted by nitinrawatdun A true masterpiece. Do you have a video about the project? It would be really handy. |
Nope, we have not made any videos of the build. We will post videos of the final build and for test runs done using a G Tech data logger.