Couldn’t post earlier as was caught up in year-end activities!
Quote:
Originally Posted by iss1307 Yes , have gone through the entire thread of the niggles. But these rattles and all are there if you pay some serious attention to details right? And as enthusiasts we all do that. Am I right when I say that the niggles can be looked over as trade-offs? |
I wouldn’t say that the niggles can be overlooked. If you are going to self-drive the car, these niggles will be quite prominent but if you will be in the back seat, then perhaps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iss1307 We want a car which would be with us for 7 long years and our current car the WagonR sits at 42000 after 6 years. So our commute is pretty low.
Which premium car would you suggest under 10 lakhs?
We saw the Verna, was pretty good but 2016 will see a new generation but in the later half. We haven't visited VW yet, will visit soon. Fiat was never in the list. Ciaz, is fine, parents not so happy with the looks. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by iss1307 Our budget is of 10 lakhs.
Which cars do you guys suggest?
I have the Ecosport Ecoboost in the list. But it is available only in Titanium+ which 11,32,000 OTR and a Trend+ which is like a base variant which I don't like. |
I agree no petrol sedan south of 10L apart from Ciaz, but since you are ready to contemplate cars from other segments, how about S-Cross? Massive discounts going on currently on the car and it’s damn solid. You have mentioned EcoSport yourself so could check it out. If you have patience, why don’t you hang on for the Maruti YBA or the BRV to be launched (although I have no idea about the prices, should be close to your budget)?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shreyans_Jain I don't think so. The promise of the City was that it was a fill it-shut it-forget it kind of car that you just could not go wrong with. This was also why the car had such good resale value. That is no longer the case now. The competition has improved while the City has deteriorated. At current prices, I see no reason to pick the petrol City over the Vento TSi apart from sheer cabin space. |
While I don’t know about the VW, I totally agree on other points. The new City just isn’t the same.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajeevraj No car is niggle free, but the kind of niggles and the frequency I have been reading on this thread, seems a bit too much for a upward of 10L car- that too a Honda. |
Bang on! I drove a SX4 which seemed to have lesser niggles when I sold it after 4 years vis-à-vis my new City which is less than 2 years old.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbohead 4th Gen City is a huge leap in most depts except downright reliability and quality. As you know there is a thread dedicated to this. Honda should and I hope is working on these problems. |
As a new City owner, I agree on the quality part. Reliability seems to be fine as I haven't faced any major issues till now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKMahajan My 2 cents - This is the first time I have heard someone generalize City as unreliable. I had a City (2006 ZX VTEC) for 9 years and sold it to get an automatic Jazz. I could have kept it for 6 more years - it was so niggle free. |
Two close cousins still have their 7-year old ZX and 3-year old 3rd gens and they still feel solid. The grievances are with the 4th gen City.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shreyans_Jain My fundamental grouse with the car is that it has aged very quickly. From dull and scratched paint to noises and rattles all over to a rough sounding engine (mine is diesel) with a clunky gearshift to soft and sagging seats to things like brakes and suspension taking a beating. It does not feel like a car that has 40k km on the clock, but like one which has done twice or thrice that mileage.
To give credit where it is due, the City is very easy to drive in traffic. The car shrinks around you. Steering is very light, the turning circle is really tight and agility is good. The car is always willing to change directions quickly at your command. You never feel the size of the thing. And it isn't that big anyway.
Don't for the moment think the car will leave you stranded at night in the middle of the road It is NOT unreliable. But at the same time, it has to be said that be car seems to have been designed and built against serious cost targets. As such, this generation of the car with just have to live with its basic issues. I will not get my hopes up about quality levels magically improving in the new year or even with the eventual facelift. |
Bro – you seem to be in exact the same boat as me! I agree with all your points with the difference that mine is petrol so the engine point doesn’t count in my agreement. The petrol is brilliant to drive.
I also agree that the car isn’t unreliable. But it’s not one where I am happy putting my 11L.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iss1307 But lemme answer your question about replacing the H with the T. I think I would still buy it. It's not the brand that attracts me, it's the flair the car has. |
Hmm - really? Somewhere it does come down to brand value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mayank0782 "You have been eyeing it for a while now, secretly, when no one's looking. At traffic lights, parking lots, sometimes right outside your house. You have been quietly nursing a desire, that someday you will hold it, grab it, look into its eyes and say you are mine. Today is that someday" |
Classic happy 3rd gen vs. 4th gen
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejas08 Again, its each individual's perception and choice. Those who want quality can shift to Germans & other Stuff. Those who want reliability can have the Japs & Koreans. |
I kind of disagree – I have a ZX, 3rd gen and 4th gen City in my immediate family. The previous 2 were brilliant compared to the 4th gen in terms of quality. I would gladly exchange the toys in the 4th gen for the solidness of the 3rd gen – it was quality along with reliability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejas08 It will be almost two years since the launch of the 4th Gen City. There has been no complaint with regards to the City dropping dead in the middle of nowhere, even after some people have clocked over 40K & 50K kms. |
Agree – the point is not on reliability.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejas08 A correction. It's 10K kms / 6 Months. |
Yes – my bad. However, if you check the “how often you change the engine oil thread”, you will see that 10k km / 12 months is the ideal scenario. Honda is ripping off customers with the 10k km / 6 months routine and this is a point on which our Mods have agreed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tejas08 As such it is good to get the Engine Oil changed between 7-8K Kms. |
I will. But give me time till 12 months because I have less running. In 6 months I will run max 3-4k km so an engine oil change isn’t justified but I have to get it done due to warranty issues!