Quote:
Originally Posted by sbasak Although dirty politics, regionalism, lack of funds, discourage from family etc. contribute to the problem, the bottom line is that Indians, in general, are not very strong physically!
An average American/European are much stronger than average Indians. This is fact.
India has comparatively better position in cricket because only few countries play cricket. If cricket was popular like football, Indian's position would have not been any better in global ranking (compared to our football ranking).
However, we are in generally better in academics compared to our western counterparts. There was a scientific study conducted on why so many Indians are in IT and it was stated that Indians are very much argumentative by nature which is beneficial for IT. (although India got jobs initially mainly for cost factor, it is no longer the only reason)
Throughout the history, we never invaded another country. It simply shows we don't really have the agressive attitude (it's a requirement for many sports). If we were strong, how come a few thousands British could rule millions of us for 200 years??
Every race has its own expertise. Unfortunately, sports have never been Indian's forte. |
No offense boss but that is one of the stupidest posts I have ever read.
What is the scientific proof of the "fact" that Indians are weaker or Europeans or Americans or stronger? And what other interesting "facts" do you have? That north Indians are stronger than south Indians? That Chinese are very weak (you would be wrong in assuming that by looking at their sizes)? You know before the 1971 war the Pakistanis used to beleive that they are "genetically stronger" (now whatever the hell that means) and they were taller and stornger and braver and blah blah blah. And that Indians were short and dark and weak. And everybody knows what was the result of the war(not just 1971, the ones before and after it).
At the end of the day it all comes down to attitude towards sports. In India we have a pathetic attitude and that's why we don't win. What is the budget of the Indian Olympic Commitee? 10-15 crores? In contrast look at the budget of the IPL teams and how much each player is making. If you had a choice of playing for say Kolkata Knight Riders for cricket or Mohan Bagan or East Bengal for football which one would YOU choose to enhace your career and life and fame? Got the point? There is no frikkin encouragement at all. So why would anyone bother to go to any other sports? And also I think you are forgetting hockey. The oh so weak Indians won so many medals. Back then they had grass fields and we were good. Now hockey is played on astroturf. And guess how many astroturf fields are in India? None at all!! Then how the heck is our team supposed to perform? You know when our cricket team(ok forget the national cricket team, even the Ranji teams) when they go outside their city to play, they get to stay in nice star hotels. You know where our hockey team stays, the national hockey team btw, when they go out? They stay in schools or some broken down lodge. Now where is the motivation for them to go out and play? Kasba Jadhav got a medal for India at Helsinki 1952 olympics. I read a few years ago that his descendents had to sell his medal to make their ends meet. If such is the state of sports where is the motivation? Where is the respect?
So you say Indians are more inclined towards academics. So does that mean we are "genetically smarter" than Europeans or Americans? No! All it means we have a different priority. Since these western countries are rich, the govt takes care of the people and they don't have to be well educated to make a decent living. Heck a plumber can make $100k here. And all he needs is to be 12th pass. In India it is different. Without education you are nothing. Competiton is cutthroat and if you are not able to survive you will be left behind in life. And if you are a plumber in India you defnitley won't make $100k.
And also we say India never invaded a country in the last so many 1000 years. Ok first of all its a lie, partly. Ever heard of the Chola empire? If not please google the extant of their empire and you will see the truth about invasions. 2nd of all, and more importantly, there was no
need to invade others. What do we have beyond India's borders(by India I mean greater India that includes Pakistan and Bangladesh). India is so fertile and rich in resources we don't have need to go outside. We had all the wealth in India itself. Heck that's why invaders came to India. That's why Mohd Ghazni came to India to loot the Somnath Temple 17 times! And what is beyond India? Afghanistan? That place is so barren it has nothing but rocks and mountains( Ghazni and Ghori were Afghans. See why they came to India?). Iran? Why would anybody want to leave India and invade a freakin desert? Central Asia? The very reason mongols spread out was that there were no resourses there.
And why did the British( well Mughals too) rule us? Btw Mughals were from Central Asia, Uzebekistan to be precise, so they were not "Indian". Well both Mughals and Brits outsmarted us. Rana Sangha lost the Battle of Khanwa to Babur because Sangha's Tomar general betrayed him as Babur promised a kingdom to the betrayer. And Battle of Khanwa, 1527, marks the beginning of the Mughal rule in India. As far as the Brits go they did the same. In Battle of Plassey, 1757, which marks the starting of British rule, they bribed Mir Jaffer. So out of Siraj ud Daulah's 50000 strong army, only 5000 fought against the Brits. Now all these are instances of "chal" not "bal". And coming to the Brits, they were the ones who created all this "genetically weak" and "martial race" bullc#@p so as to create an inferiority complex in the minds of Indias so they won't arise in rebellion. Unfortunately it is being followed by educated Indians even after 60 years of the Brits leaving India.
Please do not spread such self defeating lies. Brits left us 60 years ago, we should have enough confidence in ourself to examine the real reason for what happened and not some bs about "genetically" weak myth or whatever.
So in the end to win it comes down to $$ and attitude towards sports. Both of which we are lacking.
Sorry for the big rant. It just bothers me that some of us still have a "collective" inferiority complex.