|
| |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #8356 |
| BHPian Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: @ Driver's Seat @
Posts: 591
Thanked: 18 Times
| |
| | |
| | #8357 | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bhagyanagaram. (A.K.A. Hyderabad)
Posts: 1,586
Thanked: 10 Times
| Quote:
![]() STINGER this is the linky to the battery i was giving a thought to. | |
| | |
| | #8358 |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bangalore
Posts: 6,307
Thanked: 1,040 Times
| Guys, there is a separate thread for batteries, right? |
| | |
| | #8359 | |
| BHPian Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Mumbai - Bombay
Posts: 628
Thanked: 5 Times
| Quote:
Good Battery - Go for it !! | |
| | |
| | #8360 |
| BHPian Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 42
Thanked: 0 Times
| Thank you Technocrat for moving my post the the right location & for the edit. *sigh* I wish someone could tell me a word or two on how 8" / 10" / 12" subs compare. I've searched the threads, but haven't found an answer. I have JBL GTO 607c & 937 in an NHC, would like to complement it with a sub. My installer (Sprocket Hyderabad) is pushing me to put a Soomoku Active Sub. Says its vfm and good quality "Saar, 99% of the people who tried it bought it, its that good". I did locate a thread dedicated to Soomoku, but that was nearly 2 years old... in that some senior BHPians liked it but the Gurus didn't consider it vfm. So, I ask now is Soomoku any better these days? If not, what is a good vfm active sub / sub+monoblock. Thanks, Giri |
| | |
| | #8361 | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bhagyanagaram. (A.K.A. Hyderabad)
Posts: 1,586
Thanked: 10 Times
| Quote:
dont buy soomoku furiousspinx already has a basstube of the same make ask him for a review and there are many a places with good installers and products now! I dont recommend the sprocket here any more, he had good installers and now they just have left the shop, and the shop keeper dint stand by his words with a few bhpians here, the spinxy and maverick236 so we dont recommend him. if you want a good sounding setup with a sub then might i suggest the JBL cs1204 or pioneer TSW-307 (single voice coil sub) in a sealed or ported box with an amp upgrade for better sound! you can either get a better 4-channel or get a 4-channel and a mono! if its only the 4-channel upgrade then go for GT5-A604 you can use it for front components and bridge the other two channels for the sub! or you get the same amp use it for four speakers and get the GT5-A3001 mono for the sub! either of the set ups will be good, the current sony amp will not be powerful enough to drive a sub for the right punch! ![]() hope this helps, for further queries PM me pal. Last edited by rider60 : 8th July 2008 at 02:37. | |
| | |
| | #8362 |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: mumbai
Posts: 18,042
Thanked: 1,136 Times
| |
| | |
| | #8363 | |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Bhagyanagaram. (A.K.A. Hyderabad)
Posts: 1,586
Thanked: 10 Times
| Quote:
there are amps to choose from with different power ratings and impedances and so are the subs. different type of installs give different kinds of music and amount of sound produced also differs! ![]() | |
| | |
| | #8364 |
| BHPian Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: mumbai
Posts: 355
Thanked: 0 Times
| guys. can you help with a couple doubts please explain (navinbhai i wudnt go nuts if you came out with all the in depth explanations! hehe) 1. how a two channel amp which is rated 75*2 converts to 200-225rms when bridged (when logically 75+75=150).Also why in different amps this gain is different e.g some 2channel amps (60*2 rms) advertise 200rms when bridged and others advertise 180rms why this difference between manufacturers even though their per channel rms value is the same. 2. i have come across 1 amp 100*2rms @4ohms which claims to give out a whopping 400rms @ 4ohms when bridged (however they dont specify whether that value is peak or not) is that possible Hifonics TXi 4008 (txi4008) , Car Amplifiers, 2-Channel Amps - Sonic Electronix# 3. sub A has specifications - 85db @1volt and sub B has a specification 91db @2.83 volts How would one compare these subs in this case 4. Is there a thumb rule to know(or expect) if sub A (rated 60-250rms) or sub B rated (50-150rms) would play better/louder/tighter etc if both are fed with the same power 180rms -(assuming all other factors same ) |
| | |
| | #8365 | ||||
| Distinguished - BHPian ![]() | Let me see if I can reduce navinji's work ![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
since the voltage for sub B is 2.83V, the ratio is 2.83, and 20 log (2.83) = 9dB. subtracting that from sub B , you get 82 dB at 1Volt Quote:
![]() Last edited by greenhorn : 10th July 2008 at 23:14. | ||||
| | |
| | #8366 | |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: mumbai
Posts: 18,042
Thanked: 1,136 Times
| Quote:
1. please reconsider any amp that claims a bridged output that is 4x that of it's stereo output. This is theory and unless the amp has a fantastically low output impedance and fantastically high current deliverably this is very rare so consider such specs with a table spoon of salt (table spoon = a pinch and then some) 2. I am surprised that soemone has rated sensitivity at 1volt. Usually it is measured at 1W or 2.83V (which is 1W at 8 ohms and 2W at 4ohms). 3. When determining which speaker will play louder consider sensitivity (but since there are no standards for measuring sensitvity) also consider the Bl/Mms ratio. For subs in cabin/room response, position/location, and system loading (the same sub in free air or a ported box will be likely be louder than in a sealed box) should also be considered. Thanks greenhorn. Last edited by navin : 11th July 2008 at 09:55. | |
| | |
| | #8367 |
| Senior - BHPian Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: New Delhi
Posts: 2,912
Thanked: 47 Times
| |
| | |
| | #8368 |
| BHPian Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 42
Thanked: 0 Times
| @Rider60: Many thanks for your inputs. I will pm you regarding good installers in Bhagyanagaram ... Its time they changed this city's name like they've done with Bengalooru, Kolkotta, Mumbai & Chennai. Just kidding.@Navin: Thank you again for your earlier post. I will perhaps choose my upgrade and get your views on the items I plan to add. |
| | |
| | #8369 | |
| Team-BHP Support ![]() Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: mumbai
Posts: 18,042
Thanked: 1,136 Times
| Quote:
Correction: Greenhorn got ALL of it correct. | |
| | |
| | #8370 | |
| BHPian Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: mumbai
Posts: 355
Thanked: 0 Times
| Quote:
2. yep i found it a little different too but hers a link to crosscheck http://www.crutchfield.com/App/Product/Item/Main.aspx?g=520&i=575P1S410&search=Rockford+Fosgat e+VENDORID575&searchdisplay=Rockford+Fosgate&tp=11 1&tab=features_and_specs 3. hmm let me rephrase the question. Consider the same brand and same range. Now if one has only 170W rms at their disposal and there are two sub options one which is rated 250rms and the other rated 150rms what moderately noticible/audible diffence (if any ) would one expect | |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OE Replacement - Navigation System for Cruze "Mega Audio" | lawyer | Sound Off and Show Off | 36 | 15th September 2012 11:43 |
| "Kicker" audio setup in my Hyundai Sonata | Frankenstein | Sound Off and Show Off | 9 | 4th March 2011 13:35 |
| Car audio losing sound at low rpms! EDIT : Solved by "The Steg" | GTO | Ask the Gurus | 162 | 23rd November 2010 17:27 |
| sub enclosure advice from audio gurus | clipto333 | Ask the Gurus | 22 | 4th January 2007 10:29 |