Yesterday my wife and I paid a visit to Dr Arup Roy Choudhury of Kalyani, the famous "Gurkha". I have not stopped short of bothering anyone for my Project Nomad, and ARC is the latest casualty. Had spoken to him many times over the phone, finally met him yesterday.
A word about the man. ARC has a tremendous knowledge of automobiles in general, and off-roading in particular. Off-roading, as we know it, is very different and far more advanced than what we typically learn in India. The machines are mechanically more advanced, the techniques employed are different, even the terrain is different. There is a lot more mechanical intervention, achieved through technological upgrades, and each of them seriously enhances the vehicle's capabilities. Except maybe Khan_Sultan's "Gypsy on Steroids", I don't recall seeing another 4X4 on this forum sporting many innovative tech upgrades! Received lot of inputs on Project Nomad as well.
Anyway, here's the real point of the post:
Predator's driving impression of the Gurkha
ARC has a 10 yr old Gurkha, the one with the IDI engine. The vehicle is stock, except for a straight through exhaust system and Pioneer ICE. Currently it is shod with imported Yokohama G052 235/80 HT tyres. I drove around the vehicle for about 7-8 kms with ARC's brother Sujoy riding shotgun and my wife on the rear seat.
Here are the main good and bad points from my TD. Remember that (a) I'm a car guy who's never owned an SUV before, so my POV will be different from a regular SUV owner, and (2) I'm not a hardcore off-roader, so I don't come with a jeep/gypsy/gurkha bias!
Good points:
1. The NVH levels - particularly
vibration and harshness - are really good. ARC's car is a 10 yr old IDI with 1.5 lakh kms on the clock. Even with a cold engine, and straight through exhaust system, the VH was less than, say, a warmed up MM or CJ!
2. The
ride quality of the vehicle is really good. Having tried both, I can say a stock Gypsy's rear seat is not for human beings, neither is the rear bench on a MM550. However, the Gurkha had very good ride quality both front and rear. The vehicle seems to smother the terrain. And ride gets better at speed.
3. There were absolutely
no rattles. This is an amazing revelation. In the last Kolkata OTR, I had driven a MM550 restored by UBS, no less. There were atleast 6 noise sources in the car. They tired me out on the way back from the OTR. In fact, when I came back to my Verna, I started appreciating the hush that modern cars offer and we take for granted.
But ARC's Gurkha had no such issues. It was a well put together vehicle that never rattled or squeaked. Except for the boom of the straight through exhaust coming through, I was not bothered by anything.
4. The Gurkha is really
capable of being driven at speed. In my PN thread, I had written "exactly how do you make a jeep go fast?". The Gurkha had no such problems. It could comfortably keep up speeds of 80 kmph, the power delivery was linear, and the gearing was comfortable enough. I tried to go faster, but Kalyani doesnt exactly have wide speedy roads. ARC claims one can comfortably drive the Gurkha at 130-140 kmph.
5.
Capable transmission - The Transmission is really on a different grade compared to a jeep or Gypsy. No fighting with the gearbox. The gear ratios are well selected, well matched to provide correct power at correct speeds. Plus there is some pleasure to be gained at your palm feeling every step of the mechanical operation, as you shift.
Bad Points
1. My biggest disappointment of the day was the
vague steering. Even around the empty roads of Kalyani, I had trouble placing the car into turns. Most glaring instance of the steering was when we came back from the drive. ARC's gate was at right angles to the road. I took a wide turning radius and tried to place the car in line with the gate, and overshot it. Even some classic cars have more predictable steering! C'mon man, how am I expected to use this vehicle in the hustle and bustle of the city?
ARC however, said it was only because I was driving it first time, and needed a few hundred miles to start feeling comfortable. His brother Sujoy drives it with pin point accuracy. But either way, its unacceptable.
2.
Below basic instrumentation - The Mahindra Bolero was launched in 2001, and a rich college buddy bought a vehicle from the first lot. Being car crazy, I was given the honour of driving it (to his) home. As much as I loved driving around that huge SUV, there was only one grouse - the instrumentation and ergonomics. If I'm paying 5 lakhs for my vehicle, I expect to have better ergonomics (stereo NOT around my knees, rear seat NOT at right angles, 6 plus footer NOT cramped for space.)
The same thought manifested itself 8 years later. The Gurkha has minimal instrumentation plonked into holes in a slab of steel. The speedo is roughly of the plastic quality that you find in Chinese, 200 rupee table clocks. There is no console, and the pioneer HU is plonked somewhere around the driver's ankles. The pleasure gained from the solid gearbox is marred by a long gearlever, which bangs against the dash on shifting forward (one of my pet hates from driving a diesel ambassador with floor shift).
The point here, is the acceptability factor. Even if the interiors don't attract prospective owners, they should at least not repel them. Even if one does not need fancy gadgets like climate control and sunglass holders, there is no problem in offering better ergonomics and better quality of plastic.
3.
Tank Like Build - Sorry to be classifying this as a disadvantage. Yes, a tank like build quality is definitely good on an OTR, and more so in surviving the urban jungle. ARC laughs recalling how an Opel Astra rear ended him once. The front of the car was wiped off, yet the Gurkha only suffered a slightly bent rear bumper.
But this is living in hypothesis. In real life, the bonnet weighs a ton, so does the tailgate. The vehicle is so tall, getting in and out is like rock climbing. The bonnet stretches a mile ahead of the driver, and being square, doesnt offer any reference on judging the extremities. Now I know why Scorpio and Safari design teams spend so much time in making the driving experience car like (not that it helps

) - basically to reduce the learning curve for new adapters.
Conclusion
You'd see all the good points I've highlighted have to do with engineering, and all the bad points have to do with living with the vehicle on a daily basis. As with all vehicles, ultimately choosing a Gurkha depends on what is important for
you.
Coming up in the first week of 2010:
1. Testing the Gurkha on a proper OTR.
2. Testing a more modern Gurkha (with the DI engine) and perhaps better ergonomics.