Massive bashing has been unleashed on the Gurkha and specifically Force Motors

It is a well accepted fact that Force motors is one of the least competitive players in the automotive space and mainly caters to UV people move segment in tier 2 tier 3 towns.
Comparing apples to apples, which would be pitting the new Gurkha against the 2016 Thar in this case. I think the Gurkha offers more than a Thar does. I'd cite the following to support my case. I shall start in descending order of attributes that most appeal to an off road enthusiast:
- Differential Locks: Thar 2016 has an auto locking rear diff Vs Gurkha's manual locking front and rear. Advantage Gurkha
- Engine: Thar has the more modern CRDE unit Vs Gurkha's old Merc derived unit. Thar's engine belts out 20 bhp and 17 NM more. Advantage Thar
- Weight: Most keen off road enthusiasts try and reduce the weight as much as possible and Gurkha loses here tipping the scales at 2.5 Ton Vs Thar's 1.75 Ton. Advantage Thar
- Wheel Base, Track Width: Gurkha has a wheelbase which is shorter by 30 mm. Gurkha also has a wider track both front and back by 45 mm and 134 mm respectively. All which will add up to better ability offroad. Advantage Gurkha
- Other standard off road friendly features:
- Front Bumper- Thar has an extended fibre bumper Vs Gurkha's short and stub metal bumper with built in fogs. Advantage Gurkha
- Gurkha comes with a standard Snorkel. Advantage Gurkha
- Gurkha also has a hard top. For overland journeys, long drives and in extreme/adverse weather conditions, the factory built hardtop has a definite advantage over the Thar. Hard top again is advantageous in terms of safety and security (occupants and their belongings). Even in case of a roll over, the Gurkha will fare better than a soft top or a custom fit fibre top Thar. Not to mention that the aftermarket Hard tops for a Thar cost quite a bit in 50k-1L range. Advantage Gurkha
- Gurkha has coil springs both front and back. Better ride quality for sure than the rear leaf spring'd Thar. Advantage Gurkha
- Approach angles: Thar is 44" Vs Gurkha's 39". Departure angles are similar at 37". Ramp break over angles need to be checked. But with Gurkha having a shorter wheel base and higher GC, it should be advantage Gurkha
- OEM Tyres: 245 wide on Gurkha vs 235 wide on Thar. Advantage Gurkha
Interiors: Thar 2016 hands down.
I write these lines to bring in some support for the Gurkha. From all the offroading videos and reviews that I have seen and read, the first and second gen Gurkhas fare better than the first and second gen Thars.
To give you all some context, I am not a hardcore offroader myself but I have done my fair bit of offroading. I have extensively driven the pre 2016 Thar (non diff lock, old dash and terrible seats) and the post 2016 Thar (good dash and relativety comfy seats) both on and off road (boulders, pebbles, dirt tracks, beaches and lake/river beds). I really like the 2016 Thar with auto rear diff lock, a feature which is enough to get you out of most offroad situations. I have no first hand experience driving any iteration of the Gurkha.
The mediocre engine, weight and after sales service are definitely major disadvantages for the Gurkha. But I shall reserve my verdict till I drive the 2017 Gurkha Xplorer 4x4 3 door hard top, which is scheduled for next week

. From the price perspective, the Gurkha looks like a better value proposition than the Thar because of more standard offroad and overlanding friendly features. Onroad price of Gurkha in Delhi/NCR is 10.7 L vs 9.7 L for the Thar. The one lakh premium can be easily attributed to the hard top, rear and front diff locks, metal offroad friendly bumper, snorkel and wider tyres.
I also think the Xpedition version in 5 door format will a great overland vehicle when it is launched in 4x4 format.
Comparing the Gurkha to a conventional ladder on frame SUV (read 4x4 Scorpio/ 4x4 Safari Storme) or the Isuzu V-max is not appropriate as they are very different vehicles for very different purposes. The price difference will also be in the range of 2 lakh (Scorpio) and even higher in case of the V-max. Also, the V-max, Scorpio 4x4, Safari Strome 4x4 are pretty bad for anything over mild offroading in OEM guise. I have taken OEM spec Dicor Safari 4x4, Strome 4x4 and Scorpio 4x4 to beaches and lake beds and they all bogged down. A Thar 4x4 was way better than them and could easily pull itself out after getting bogged out in 4x4 high. All were riding on H/T tyres, Thar had Geolander A/Ts on the rear.
A used and modded Gypsy with diff locks and 1.6 engine swap might still be a better value proposition but in the OEM guise, I think the Gurkha makes a good point for itself, unless one has the time, patience, know how and access to a skilled mechanic to build his/her own offroader.
Waiting for the many true blue offroad gurus to add to this discussion.
The response from Force motors sales team has been satisfactory and they sent me the following pictures in less than a hour of speaking to them. Cheers!