Team-BHP > Shifting gears > Gadgets, Computers & Software
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
991,443 views
Old 10th February 2008, 10:49   #1831
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

200mm or even 300mm is very less for bird photography.
400mm is just adequate.
In cheaper options there is sigma 50-500.
For even cheaper option with IS the 70-300mm IS will just do.
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 10th February 2008, 14:15   #1832
Senior - BHPian
 
kaushik_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,088
Thanked: 164 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsk1979 View Post
200mm or even 300mm is very less for bird photography.
400mm is just adequate.
In cheaper options there is sigma 50-500.
For even cheaper option with IS the 70-300mm IS will just do.
That's why I said "with teleconverter" . Yeah for proper birding you need somethings like 500mm or likes and even that too with a say 1.4x TC.As they say no focal length is sufficient enough for birding.And with every mm of focal length at that side the price of the lenses increases astronomically.
kaushik_s is offline  
Old 15th February 2008, 10:43   #1833
BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 119
Thanked: 2 Times
Query - Rechargeable batteries AA

My Canon digital camera needs 4 AA batteries. I have used Panasonic 2100 mAH rechargeables for quite a few years and found them to be long lasting. These were bought outside India. Sadly, the battery casing seems to be peeling off and it is time to look for new rechargeable AA batteries.

Please suggest a good brand, approximate cost and location where it is available. Thank you. Note that I already have a recharger and am looking for batteries only.
sreenidhibr is offline  
Old 15th February 2008, 11:28   #1834
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

Cameleon is a good brand and I have been using that happily.
Stay away from no-name brand chinese which claim 2600mAh, and also try to get panasonic only from reputed dealers, most of them sold here are fakes.
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 15th February 2008, 14:59   #1835
Senior - BHPian
 
kaushik_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,088
Thanked: 164 Times

Have used Sanyo, they are also good and still working after almost 2.5-3 years. But as tsk said, camelleon is also a good brand.
kaushik_s is offline  
Old 15th February 2008, 15:13   #1836
Senior - BHPian
 
nishantgandhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 1,220
Thanked: 156 Times

Canon Powershot A75 (3.2 MP) - my first digicam
Canon IXUS 800IS (6 MP)
JVC Everio GZ-MG155 camcorder (30GB HDD)

The best part about Canon is its user friendliness and service.
E.g. my 4 year old Canon Powershot A75 (bought in Philippines) had some manufacturing defect and I got it changed free of cost in Dubai! Now thats what I call GREAT after sales service

Last edited by nishantgandhi : 15th February 2008 at 15:22.
nishantgandhi is offline  
Old 15th February 2008, 16:23   #1837
BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 119
Thanked: 2 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by nishantgandhi View Post
The best part about Canon is its user friendliness and service.
E.g. my 4 year old Canon Powershot A75 (bought in Philippines) had some manufacturing defect and I got it changed free of cost in Dubai! Now thats what I call GREAT after sales service
Exactly!
My canon A70, bought in Canada, also had a manufacturing defect (CCD error - possibly the same problem you had?). It was repaired free of cost in Bangalore, even though it was more than 2 years old at that time and I had no receipt.
sreenidhibr is offline  
Old 15th February 2008, 19:04   #1838
Senior - BHPian
 
kaushik_s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 1,088
Thanked: 164 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by sreenidhibr View Post
Exactly!
My canon A70, bought in Canada, also had a manufacturing defect (CCD error - possibly the same problem you had?). It was repaired free of cost in Bangalore, even though it was more than 2 years old at that time and I had no receipt.
Same happened to my old A95.That was because canon has issued a service notice to replace the defective CCD's of few particular models which were affected due to some issue with their China factory during that time.It's some quality control issue.But whatever it is,it was very nice from Canon's part to do it for free to all the affected customers.
kaushik_s is offline  
Old 16th February 2008, 16:39   #1839
BHPian
 
redrage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bengaluru
Posts: 553
Thanked: 106 Times

Guys could some one confirm when the 450 D is getting released in the US and at what price? My uncle is coming down from the US in 1st week of April. So i get a good deal i thought i could pick it up.
redrage is offline  
Old 16th February 2008, 16:59   #1840
BHPian
 
Hellcat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bangalore
Posts: 222
Thanked: 5 Times

450D will be available in US by March 2008.
Hellcat is offline  
Old 20th February 2008, 15:35   #1841
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

Look what got reviewed
Olympus E-3 Review: 1. Introduction: Digital Photography Review
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 20th February 2008, 19:21   #1842
BHPian
 
simran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gurgaon
Posts: 171
Thanked: 13 Times

I needed some information on scanning.

I tried scanning some of my old prints using an HP scanner, the matte finish ones turned out Ok, but the glossy ones were not good. I have the negatives, and I thought of getting them scanned. I was told at the photo-shop that the machine scans at 200 dpi only.

Anyone knows any alternatives? Any shop that has a better negative scanner in NCR?

TIA!
simran is offline  
Old 20th February 2008, 19:29   #1843
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 25,831
Thanked: 45,589 Times

Wow, I didn't expect them to post it so soon, they usually delay Olympus reviews.

The following page left me confused: Olympus E-3 Review: 20. Photographic tests: Digital Photography Review

Does that mean I can stick to shooting jpegs? He says there is no advantage to shooting raw in E3, and jpeg is great. That will save lots of disk space for me.
Samurai is offline  
Old 20th February 2008, 19:50   #1844
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 25,831
Thanked: 45,589 Times

It's up E-3 review ... Highly recommended (just) [Page 2]: Olympus SLR Talk Forum: Digital Photography Review

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Joinson, dpreview.com
Most cameras produce noticeably lower resolution results in JPEG than we can get by careful RAW conversion. The E-3 offers almost identical resolution in RAW and JPEG, because it's limited by the filter on the sensor, not the in-camera processing. It's actually not such a big deal (you're not going to see it in most shots), but it's, shall we say an 'interesting' decision by Olympus, given how good the lenses it offers are.
This is something very interesting.
Samurai is offline  
Old 21st February 2008, 00:00   #1845
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,717
Thanked: 22,825 Times

That basically means that in oly you do not get the extra advantage by shooting raw.
But I would still say shoot raw because
1. You can correct white balance issues, which are almost impossible to fix gracefully in jpeg
2. You can make minor exposure tweaks
3. You can choose the PP.
What they are saying that jpeg conversion of E-3 is very good, i.e. their PP is what one would normally do in PC flow. But what if don't want normal processing but something out of the box?
tsk1979 is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks