hey all
today i had a chance to go to bimal motors to check on the estilo. we were five friends and went to the showroom after our lunch. much to our expectation there were two estilos parked inside, a blue one and a striking red one. what i saw in the live telecast of the launch versus this was quite different. i ll try and summarize a few points here:
1. The front part (bonnet area) is more or less as similar as wagon r. The curvy headlamps almost extend upto the front doors almost! and they are cute to look at.
2. Open the bonnet and you find all the mechanics very neatly arrange and it shows off the 16V engine of the car. Contrary to 800 the bonnet open switch is a pull towards you mechanism more than a toggle kinds
3. I didnt quite find the boot opener switch anywhere in the car atleast near the drivers seat.
4. First i decided to sit behind instead of the front. The space behind is amazing for a tiny car like that. Its much much better than Santro. But Estilo is strictly a four seater. Perhaps a kid will fit as well in the back but no more.
5. The upholstery is not exactly exciting but its neither boring.
6. The rear seats do not have 40-60 fold option which might not be so good.
7. Now to the front of the car. The front space seems ample and good enough compared to the wagon R. the dash board itself is deep and extends much to the front when compared to the wagon R. It has good cubby holes everywhere to put your things.
8. The side railings on which you place your hand is much more than a handle and it often disturbed me when moving my hand around. The power window switches follow an arranged geometry and look bland and uninteresting. the door handles are of filthy quality plastic (perhaps like a plasticized version of the ford fiesta handles) and can break anytime easily.
9. the door has that reassuring thud that you would find in the likes of swift or palio so that sounded a bit comforting.
10. Now over to the drivers side. the car has an EPS which looks of good color and grade (3 spoke). Of the three pedals at the bottom, I found that the level of the accel pedal is much lower than that of the brake or the clutch which is really disturbing. It can and is susceptible to cause lots of pain each time while switching from accel to brake. The gear shift is long like the versa but nicely padded with lots of art leather, which does not hide its otherwise sticky nature.
11. the gear shift itself is very very uninteresting. the feedback is sick and not like the swift or santro if you know what i mean. its high time maruti sticks to shorter shift sticks. and the gear shift is slightly to the left which means if you have a girlfriend, you can feel her along while putting the gear
. another thing is that when i was on the drivers seat, i found the gear shift to be slightly behind my normal hand position (this i felt in aveo too, but not in palio or 800 or even fiesta) - could be an irritant for some.
12. the boot is defnitely big, bigger than santro i can say or atleast of same size if not less. but the boot has no depth like the one in swift its all in one plane.
13. the rear light assembly looks good contrary to what it looks like on webpages. its all clear lens standard. The wheel size looks smaller for that car although some upsizing must be possible. anyday the swift looks macho in this area!!
So in all, if you are the types who want macho image, with good tyres, good gear shifts and driving pleasure, forget estilo and head for swift, but if you are the family types of four people looking for a raised high mounted vehicle with good view and smaller to handle with loads of back space, perhaps estilo is the one you should die for!
I m really sorry that at this moment i dont have pics, but if i do manage to get some close up pics i ll post them over.