Quote:
Originally Posted by csentil Just to clarify.. I'm not a Mclaren fan, neither am I a Ferrari fan. I like certain drivers and believe in racing producing the results and not waiting for 4 days after the race is over to see who came first or second. F1 should probably do the winners podium in the next race for the previous race !!
Mclaren receiving it from the FIA is a known issue for some years, rightly or wrongly, and Ferrari getting the benefit of doubt is also widely accepted.
Imagine Trulli's plight. Kicked up, then down and then back up again !!
And is Hamilton so dumb that he categorically denies that any instructions were given and then goes on and says everything in an interview after the race? Was he sure that he'll not get caught because he's in Mclaren?? Or does he believe that FIA is so dumb that they will not hear about it from the media and other teams !!! That is what interests me....
Also why did Mclaren appeal if they asked Hamilton to let Trulli overtake? Why should they appeal that Trulli overtook during SC. Didn't Mclaren know that the FIA will look into the radio communications?
Either Mclaren/Hamilton were too dumb or too smart.
Strange that Vettel got jacked. It was a 50-50 accident and it can be argued that Rosberg was also wrong. However agree that he shouldn't have been driving with a damaged car.
What about Barrichello. He did his part I thought into nosing a few out. Why didn't he get hit with a penalty? If those were racing incidents the same goes for Vettel.
FIA needs to get its rules and procedures in order. How sad that Toyota didn't appeal because the precedent was that all appeals get thrown out. Then what's the point in having an appeal then. |
+1 to that.
If we go through the details of everything that FIA's been saying now, it just gets stranger and stranger.
Firstly, the entire car/pit radio transmission is with the FIA throughout. But they didn't go through it till after having already pronounced a verdict. That implies that the first decision was based entirely on driver statements. Now, when has this ever been the case before?
It's called an FIA 'investigation' but seems like they just carried out an interrogation and gave a verdict! Then only later they realised that they needed to investigate and found the full radio communication, and blamed it on McLaren for concealing it. It's a little ridiculous.
What about McLaren's claim that they tried to contact Whiting for clarification, did they verify that?
I'm not saying here that McLaren are innocent, it's just that this investigation was a farce, and due to this gross (and deliberate?) mishandling of the incident, McLaren's being blamed (and punished) for a lot more than what was their due. |