Quote:
Originally Posted by MetalClank What is the tested mileage of the 4WD Z8L AT Diesel? . I could not find any reliable source of this information anywhere (searched a lot)! |
Mate, I did report on the MT 4WD diesel, along with comparisons to the XUV700 and some calculations. Link to FE post in the report:
https://www.team-bhp.com/forum/suvs-...ml#post5360924 (Choosing an SUV up to 22L | Seltos, Harrier / Safari, Hector Plus, Compass, XUV700, Kicks, Scorpio N) Quote:
Originally Posted by Indepth ...
2. It's ridiculously easy to drive a Scorpion. I currently drive a GT TSI, and it still never felt as if I was driving a humongous vehicle.
However, no steering feedback is a turn off. I mean, why should an off-roader vehicle feel like a first generation i20? Of course, I am exaggerating a bit here, but the steering is very light and quite vague. |
Mate, great to hear someone talk about steering feedback (not heaviness); an aspect which seems to be lost, as more and more people only really experience an EPS (generally with little feedback).
While I too fret at steering feel quite missing in most newer vehicles, and them having an EPS, the answer mate, might lie in your observations itself. A soft EPS is welcomed by most as it is easier around town, and now what people are generally used to and see as newer technology. EPS is also usually cheaper, easier to maintain with lesser mechanical and failing parts as compared to a feedback-friendly HPS, besides being a tad more fuel efficient. The Scorpio-N would anyway likely have issues with FE.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rahulya007 Also, when the seat can be adjusted to match your comfortable position, i fail to understand why telescopic steering which essentially brings the steering closer to the driver should be missed so much.
... help understand this point a bit. |
A sliding seat allows distance adjustment between the seat and both the steering and the pedals combined. Add a telescopic steering and you can adjust the distance between all three, the seat, pedals and the steering. It allows for more body types and proportions to drive the car ergonomically. Not all people of the same height have similar proportions. (eg: I find the headroom lacking in many cars, where people taller than me don't have issues)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetalClank The Scorpio N Diesel 4WD DO NOT GET ZIP, ZAP, ZOOM. Is there a reason why? How good or bad is this if one goes for the Scorpio N Diesel 4WD option? |
The max (zoom) mode is the full power and torque of the engine as specified. The other modes are changing the torque curves (typically lowering/limiting the torque and consequently power) to more fuel efficient setups. In AT, they also change the RPMs at which gears change. In a sense, it is like driving a lower powered car.
Scorpio-N Diesel is already tuned to lower torque and power figures, despite more weight (also unsprung mass, bigger tyres) as compared to an XUV700 leading to significantly lower Torque/tonne in diesel. Further, the 4WD has extra weight and points of friction (using up torque, power), and also added unsprung mass. Further lowering it might not lead to sufficient benefits in FE for it to be meaningful. The development costs of testing and making new torque curve maps, and gear changes too are saved; further the company might also consider buyers paying the premium for 4WD to be less FE sensitive.
Having lower modes of Zip and Zap might also lead to a bad word of mouth of the vehicle being under-powered; also due to people insisting on using lower modes when higher torque is needed. (Note: Lower powered and torque vehicles might successfully work too, but other aspects as gear ratios etc too come into play - is OT)
Non-Scorpio-N specific points (for 4WD use)
Terrain modes too have mappings about when to press brakes for stability, when to change gears, how much difference in slip between wheels triggers what actions by the system electronics, throttle response etc.
Eg: A slight difference in the left and right rear tyres spin speed in sand mode might not be a big deal, whereas in rock mode it would be. In rock mode, one would want the accelerator inputs to translate to a more gradual change in engine response (sudden changes lead to breaking traction). Adding a further layer of Zip and Zap would be needless complication.
Quote:
Originally Posted by alokk0912 Looking for thoughts on Petrol vs diesel AT. My running is low (less than 500 kms per month) and I keep my cars for long time.
I took test ride of both and enjoyed the Petrol engine more than diesel. I already have Thar so not looking for 4WD. |
I expect it to be significantly lower than the XUV700 especially in stop and go city traffic due to the weight, higher unsprung mass, and bigger tyres; and even so on the highway due to less friendly aerodynamics.
With low usage, it might not bother you, and if you can live with that, I think Petrol would be the one to go for. More power and torque (similar to the XUV700) unlike diesel. You would also have lesser to worry about undemocratic orders from NGT like ones in Delhi had to face, and Kolkatta is under the threat of. If selling well before 10 years, the resale of the Diesel could well be more, but we don't know how electric cars change that over the years (i.e. both might have poor resale).