Team-BHP > Technical Stuff
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Closed Thread
  Search this Thread
34,990 views
Old 26th November 2007, 11:30   #31
Senior - BHPian
 
Shan2nu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hubli - Karnata
Posts: 5,533
Thanked: 125 Times

Quote:
Also, weight-wise, isn't the VTEC lighter?
Baleno - 975kgs
VTEC - 985kgs

Shan2nu
Shan2nu is offline  
Old 26th November 2007, 13:29   #32
BHPian
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 95
Thanked: 4 Times

What is the 0-100 and 0-100-0 timing for a stock Non VTEC OHC 1.5?
dhiman is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 17:31   #33
Senior - BHPian
 
supremeBaleno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chennai / Kochi
Posts: 5,654
Thanked: 2,802 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by dhiman
What is the 0-100 and 0-100-0 timing for a stock Non VTEC OHC 1.5?
Yes, that would be good to know, given the hype around the 'vtec' - I am sure narayan would agree. And if the figures are available, for the OHC1.3 also. BTW, what is the max power for the 1.3 and 1.5 versions of the OHC ?
supremeBaleno is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 17:56   #34
Team-BHP Support
 
BlackPearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calcutta/London
Posts: 3,629
Thanked: 17,119 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno View Post
Yes, that would be good to know, given the hype around the 'vtec' - I am sure narayan would agree. And if the figures are available, for the OHC1.3 also. BTW, what is the max power for the 1.3 and 1.5 versions of the OHC ?
AFAIK 1.3 is 93 Bhp and 1.5 non vtec is 100 bhp. by the way, is the Baleno faster to 100 than the 1.5 non vtec?
BlackPearl is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 17:59   #35
Senior - BHPian
 
kpzen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Faridabad
Posts: 5,611
Thanked: 1,879 Times

I think OHC 1.3 is 90bhp.
kpzen is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 18:09   #36
Team-BHP Support
 
BlackPearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calcutta/London
Posts: 3,629
Thanked: 17,119 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpzen View Post
I think OHC 1.3 is 90bhp.
maybe, owners please confirm....
BlackPearl is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 18:43   #37
Team-BHP Support
 
Akshay1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mumbai
Posts: 10,303
Thanked: 12,560 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by kpzen View Post
I think OHC 1.3 is 90bhp.
ohc 1.3 was definitely 92 or 93 bhp. the 1.5 was over a hundred i think.
Akshay1234 is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 18:50   #38
aZa
Senior - BHPian
 
aZa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Noida / Delhi
Posts: 1,595
Thanked: 21 Times

1.3L - 90Bhp
1.5L - 100Bhp
1.5L Vtec - 106Bhp
aZa is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 19:01   #39
Senior - BHPian
 
supremeBaleno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chennai / Kochi
Posts: 5,654
Thanked: 2,802 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackPearl
Is the Baleno faster to 100 than the 1.5 non vtec?
Nice question. Infact, even if the Baleno is not faster to the ton than the Vtec (which has 14horses more), it still would be something if it is faster than the OHC1.5 (which with the same weight has 6 more horses). So, who has the numbers for the OHC 1.5 ?
supremeBaleno is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 21:46   #40
Senior - BHPian
 
Shan2nu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hubli - Karnata
Posts: 5,533
Thanked: 125 Times

The OHC 1.5 was always overshadowed by the Vtec so not much importance has been given by auto mags to it's performance. It would be very diff to get the performance figs for this car.

I rem reading something in the region of 10.8 to 11.3 but i'm really not sure.

The top speed however is around 170kmph.

Quote:
(which with the same weight has 6 more horses)
The 1.5 and the Vtec weight the same (985kgs). So it's 10kgs heavier than the Baleno.

Shan2nu
Shan2nu is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 22:44   #41
Senior - BHPian
 
v1p3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: BLR / DXB / LON
Posts: 5,353
Thanked: 7,059 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno View Post
Nice question. Infact, even if the Baleno is not faster to the ton than the Vtec (which has 14horses more), it still would be something if it is faster than the OHC1.5 (which with the same weight has 6 more horses). So, who has the numbers for the OHC 1.5 ?
Baleno is faster than OHC 1.5 to 100, a fact confirmed by various magazines. The numbers however are, as usual, a little sketchy.
v1p3r is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 22:59   #42
Senior - BHPian
 
shuvc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Kolkata
Posts: 2,913
Thanked: 354 Times

IIRC, the Baleno LXi weighs 975, whereas the VXi weighs 985. These were the figures when I bought mine.
shuvc is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 23:12   #43
Senior - BHPian
 
IronWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Benga-loo-ru
Posts: 1,569
Thanked: 45 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyneverdie View Post
buddy your sadly mistaken

i live in mumbai at carmichael road
9820075518 is my cell no
give me a call will take you for a spin one of these nights and prove it to you
eh? Why are we talking about the Fat Swift here? this thread clearly states Baleno and OHC Vtec

Quote:
Originally Posted by mclaren1885 View Post
Firstly, the Vtec is way quicker to the ton and 1/4 mile when compared to the Suzi. Also while comparing the two cars one must also keep in mind that there is a difference of 12bhp or 15bhp depending on E-II or E-III balenos. This difference is a hell lot when compared on bone stock cars. Which obviously shows in the end results.

Also one needs to consider the fact that the Vtec revvs to 7100 rpm while the Baleno revvs to 6500 or 6750 (depending on versions) minus the Vtec (which plays a significant role in the way it revvs). Plus the taller gear ratios on the Baleno doesn't always translate to better power delivery as well.

If both cars are to be measured on an even keel what one will have to do is get a higher cam profile for the Baleno to make up for the Vtec advantage, change the intake and make the Baleno revv to 7,100 as well. All this with the Vtec being stock. Only then would it be a fair comparo.
Atleast to a certain extent. Even then the Vtec would still be in a advantageous position.
I agree with Mcl... Baleno Vs OHC Vtec is not a fair comparison. The Baleno 1.6 is underpowered compared to the Vtec and does not have something called 'Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control'

What I would like to see is a Stock Baleno 91/94bhp Vs a OHC 100bhp.

Quote:
Honda 1.3L - 90Bhp
Baleno 1.6L - 91/94Bhp
Honda 1.5L - 100Bhp
Honda 1.5L Vtec - 106Bhp
Forget the 1.3L City.. what I want to know is
Baleno 1.6L - 91/94Bhp Vs Honda 1.5L - 100Bhp = ????

Also can someone post the last competitive pricing of the
Baleno Vs Vtec/non Vtec

I bought the Baleno over the City just for this... I know I was getting more More Value and Cost per Bhp with the Baleno.
IronWolf is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 23:48   #44
Team-BHP Support
 
manson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bombay
Posts: 3,949
Thanked: 4,251 Times

AFAIK, even a stock OHC 1.5 is faster than the Baleno. Period.

manson.
manson is offline  
Old 27th November 2007, 23:54   #45
Team-BHP Support
 
BlackPearl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calcutta/London
Posts: 3,629
Thanked: 17,119 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by supremeBaleno View Post
Nice question. Infact, even if the Baleno is not faster to the ton than the Vtec (which has 14horses more), it still would be something if it is faster than the OHC1.5 (which with the same weight has 6 more horses). So, who has the numbers for the OHC 1.5 ?
yup, my thoughts are same. I would be quite happy to know that Baleno can outrun a car with 9 bhp more
BlackPearl is offline  
Closed Thread

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks