@ sierrakamat: That is one sweet ride dude! Could you scan and post a clearer picture of it? It looks like an NA version to me, guessing from the rear bumper and headlights. Those alloys give the car a killer look. Is that the metallic military green colour that was offered on the Sierra Turbo?
That crash-guard is the same one featured in the Sierra Turbo TV ad, where a bunch of guys cordon off a space in an open parking lot with a chain link fence before a dude in a dandy suit rolls up and parks his maroon Sierra Turbo in it, followed by the tagline "It's not owned, It's possessed". Just loved that ad, and that particular car too. Incidentally, the ad car looks like one of those rare 4x4 Sierra Turbos. I wonder where it is today.
@ kaustubh:
Even I haven't seen a black (powder-coated) crash guard on any Tata Sierra/Estate/207 DI till date. They are all chrome-plated. But if your are keen, you can always buy a chrome-plated one and get it powder-coated. Or, you can try and find an accessory-seller who can get it made-to-order for you from his supplier.
As for the engine, here are some hard figures about the engines that you are considering:
3.0 L DI Turbo
--------------
Power: 70 PS @ 3000 rpm
Max. Torque: 22.7 Kg-m (223Nm) @1600 - 2200 rpm
2.0 L IDI TCIC
--------------
Power: 90 PS @ 4300 rpm
Max. Torque: 19 Kg-m (190Nm) @ 2000-3000 rpm
Does anyone know if these 2 Sumo variants come with the same gearbox and identical ratios? After all, these figures make sense only if they are translated into something meaningful "at-the wheels", and this work is done by the GB.
If you are looking at some good long-distance highway cruising with power-on-tap, then the 2.0 IDI is better. Fundamentally, it's a good all-rounder, and a very good proven workhorse. And it's plug-n-play in a Sierra.
If you really need good low-end grunt and the "heave-ho" nose-lifting torque
, then the 3.0 DI is for you.
Do bear in mind though, that 70 PS of peak power is just about equivalent to the 68 PS that your existing engine churns out, so if you say your existing engine lacks outright power, then this one won't do any better. Things you need to consider:
1. Is the 3.0 L DI a direct fit in the Sierra, or bodily modifications are required to fit it in?
2. It's noisy and vibrates a lot. Has that 15-year old body been designed to withstand them?
3. It's definitely heavier than the 2.0 L. And I assume the difference is quite a bit, considering the 50% jump in capacity.
4. Is that body up to the task after all these years? As it is, something or the other is always rattling in old TATA cars (at least in mine, no offense). I can't imagine what would happen if I were to put that engine under the hood.
Lastly, the difference in fuel efficiency of both engines should be negligible.
Besides these 2 engines, I have heard a lot about Toyota engines being used in the Sierra. Abroad, the 2.0L Turbo was a favorite, in India I think it is the Qualis engine. There is a guy named Abbas on this forum who has done this conversion to his Sierra. You can check with him. Do mind that as of today, you can find only old, used and re-conned Qualis engines in the market. Instead, you might want to find out if the Innova engine can be used, I have no idea about this at all.
I may be wrong here, but I think the chassis of the RWD Sierra is not compatible with a 4x4 setup. There are quite a few posts on this subject, including this one, from this very thread (post #2):
Quote:
Originally Posted by veyron1
... Try procuring a 4x4 Sierra (easier said than done, I tried for about 6 months with no luck). The Borg-warner transfer case and mechanicals will cost northwards of 2 Lakh rupees. Excluding suspension and labour, of course.
... The 4x4 Sierra & Safari share identical rear diff housings. The track, however, is different. IIRC, the 4x2 Sierra/NA Sierra rear track was at 1450, and the Safari/ Sierra 4x4 track stood at 1470 mm. Front's at 1500, so I guess that shouldn't matter.
The Safari's LSD is of mechanical/clutch type, and the entire assembly costs upwards of 20,000. Housing, driveshafts, pinions/gears, everything.
And yes, only the 4x4 Safaris come with LSDs. |
Also, this one:
http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/4x4-te...ml#post1489952
Also, I think the gear-boxes for 2WD and 4WD are different. So, if you are still keen on doing the 4x4 conversion, I suggest you do not change the GB now. Instead, you can go for the LSD. You can change the GB when you do the conversion.
Bottomline: For the same amount of money you will end up spending on converting your Sierra, get a good MM550 or Gypsy for OTRs, and modify it to your satisfaction (there are a few available in TBHP Classifieds too). It will save you a lot of heartache and headache.
Let the Sierra rule the tarmac, where it belongs.
EDIT: You mentioned getting the fuel pump "serviced" in one of your previous posts. Care to elaborate the exact nature of this activity? Will your mechanic also be "calibrating" it? Fuel pump calibration has to be done on a test bench. I have heard that there are only a few Bosch service centers that have the capability and expertise to do this. In case you are getting this done, do let me know where, and how much it costs.
- Bullitt.