2 Subs - Dual Mono or Stereo - "Kb ka dB"

kb100 · 1st July 2006, 15:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by rsjaurr

come on Kb100000!!!!!If ur HU has arrives then u should be

and

and not kicking ur head against wall.

Doc Saab... It has reached MUMBAI and is hopefully in the hands of this other person who's name has been inspired by his privates!

Now to get it to Coimbatore!.. cant wait!!

gunbir · 1st July 2006, 19:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by kb100

Doc Saab... It has reached MUMBAI Now to get it to Coimbatore!.. cant wait!!

KB... is it walking its way to Coimbatore???

kb100 · 2nd July 2006, 16:54

Folks... next question.. Something new has come up and I need to decide if another Tru will be necesssary...

ACTIVE Vs. PASSIVE ??

What are the advantages/disadvantages of going active??

jkdas · 2nd July 2006, 17:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by kb100

Folks... next question.. Something new has come up and I need to decide if another Tru will be necesssary...

ACTIVE Vs. PASSIVE ??

What are the advantages/disadvantages of going active??

the fun never ends at kb_land!

kb100 · 2nd July 2006, 17:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkdas

the fun never ends at kb_land!

Folks... can we debate this please... I have an install coming up in ten days.... and I need to identify the equipment immly - for me to beg/borrow/steal the funds to ensure they land in time!

Two way active Vs. Two way Passive

Third option Three way passsive - three way active will have to wait till I can afford the HX-D2... LBM... Where Are Youuuu ... :o(

speedzak · 2nd July 2006, 18:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by jkdas

the fun never ends at kb_land!

Rightly said!!!

It can also be said that Dollars are grown in trees there too!!!!!!!!!!!

low_bass_makker · 2nd July 2006, 19:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autophile

Its been a long time since i had them...I think it was for some USD 700

Man no luck for the hx-d2 right now but the iriduium are for Rs 98000/-

kb100 · 2nd July 2006, 19:11

thinking will buy another 4 channel Tru amp - If we do two way front active then I have the extra channel for rear fill. ... AND all I need to do is to remove the rear fill when I go three way active.. hmmmmmmmmmm

Why Tru?... Sonic Balance that comes with using same family of amplification.

Intelligent option perhaps .. to shut my trap and just put passives and be done with it!

low_bass_makker · 2nd July 2006, 19:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by kb100

Two way active Vs. Two way Passive

Third option Three way passsive - three way active

Man one the two way active you might save some money on the crossovers

but will have to buy the amp for the same to power ur tweeters. But beware even a single mistake will make smoke come out off ur exotic tweeters. and they will be gone for ever. And if u go for active so I assume u will be connecting the component kit 6.5 woofer with the tru I assume so u will be not getting the full utilising the tru in that case and for the tweeter u will have to buy a new amp for the tweeter as I said earlier.

So from my best opinion go with 2-way passvie and later on with collecting some more green stuff u can upgrade it later.........And it will be a foolish thing to invest so much togther in one go......Rest it is ur money .......

kb100 · 2nd July 2006, 19:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by low_bass_makker

Man no luck for the hx-d2 right now but the iriduium are for Rs 98000/-

holy crap!!!!.............

... totally irridiated!!!

low_bass_makker · 2nd July 2006, 19:52

but how did JB got them for USD 700. KB we musy ask him for the source.......

kb100 · 2nd July 2006, 20:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by low_bass_makker

but how did JB got them for USD 700. KB we musy ask him for the source.......

www.mobilesq.com

they are the distributors in the US.... the cost is on their webste...

Autophile · 3rd July 2006, 12:54

KB100,

Active any day...if you can..it gives you more control, flexibility, you can mix and match the drivers (not possible in passive), no passive crossover distortion and you can use time alignment to its full potential.

kb100 · 3rd July 2006, 13:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autophile

KB100,

Active any day...if you can..it gives you more control, flexibility, you can mix and match the drivers (not possible in passive), no passive crossover distortion and you can use time alignment to its full potential.

JB

The Pio P80RS does only Front + rear + Sub ... or HIgh + MId+ Low, .. therefore if we go active rear fill sare out of the question entirely.

IF I want rear fill and yet go active in the fron t then I necessarily have to consider the HXD2.. right?.. any other Hu /Ext crossover can give this faciliy?

kb100 · 3rd July 2006, 13:42

JB... additional amplification required to go active...

I have narrowed down on either the Audison SRX 2 or the Tru Tech T4.65.

Now the tru will keep everythign in the same family... may mean even the Timbre of the sound may be matched.. But one channel will go unused rite now (possibly future proof - in threeway terms)

SRX2 well just the two channels so fits the requirement (no wasted channels)- and cheaper to boot!

Can you tell me the differences between the SRX and the Tru in the application that we are debating.. and the difference sonically - if any..

2nd July 2006, 16:54	#408
kb100 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Bangy Boy! Posts: 1,556 Thanked: 23 Times	NEXT QUESTION - ACTVE vs PASSIVE Folks... next question.. Something new has come up and I need to decide if another Tru will be necesssary... ACTIVE Vs. PASSIVE ?? What are the advantages/disadvantages of going active??
	() Thanks

2nd July 2006, 19:11	#413
kb100 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Bangy Boy! Posts: 1,556 Thanked: 23 Times	thinking will buy another 4 channel Tru amp - If we do two way front active then I have the extra channel for rear fill. ... AND all I need to do is to remove the rear fill when I go three way active.. hmmmmmmmmmm Why Tru?... Sonic Balance that comes with using same family of amplification. Intelligent option perhaps .. to shut my trap and just put passives and be done with it!
	() Thanks

2nd July 2006, 19:52	#416
low_bass_makker Senior - BHPian Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Faridabad Posts: 6,813 Thanked: 306 Times View My Garage	but how did JB got them for USD 700. KB we musy ask him for the source.......
	() Thanks

3rd July 2006, 12:54	#418
Autophile BHPian Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: New Delhi Posts: 931 Thanked: 4 Times	KB100, Active any day...if you can..it gives you more control, flexibility, you can mix and match the drivers (not possible in passive), no passive crossover distortion and you can use time alignment to its full potential.
	() Thanks

3rd July 2006, 13:42	#420
kb100 Senior - BHPian Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Bangy Boy! Posts: 1,556 Thanked: 23 Times	JB... additional amplification required to go active... I have narrowed down on either the Audison SRX 2 or the Tru Tech T4.65. Now the tru will keep everythign in the same family... may mean even the Timbre of the sound may be matched.. But one channel will go unused rite now (possibly future proof - in threeway terms) SRX2 well just the two channels so fits the requirement (no wasted channels)- and cheaper to boot! Can you tell me the differences between the SRX and the Tru in the application that we are debating.. and the difference sonically - if any..
	() Thanks