Quote:
Originally Posted by 4x4addict I don't think we can make this comparison without seeing the Torque Curves of these engines and the fuel efficiency. Too early to compare based on topline output numbers. |
Bro, if you check my post, I mentioned only specific output and by specific output, I meant Torque/unit Disp. (Nm/lit.) & Power/unit Disp. (ps/lit.) and not about Fuel Efficiency. And in terms of both these specific outputs, D15 engine is the best-in-segment in the country (and maybe in the world?), which is clear from the table in my earlier post. And I didn't understand why you need the torque curve for comparing the specific torque.
Specific Fuel Consumption/Thermal Efficiency might or might not be the best, but that we don't have values and so, can't compare. While comparing engines, it would not be right to compare vehicle-level Fuel Consumption, since the Kerb Weight & Gear Ratios differ from vehicle to vehicle.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrAzY dRiVeR While Corona has caused this delay, I also hope this will help Mahindra launch all the drivetrain options at one go- rather than in a staged manner with only the diesel manual launching first - as initially rumoured. |
True. I also feel that both Tata & Mahindra needs to stop the phase-wise launches of their new vehicle models. Launching Automatic versions at a later stage, deprives initial customers of the option which could force them to go for competitor vehicles. And if there is a performance hike in the later versions, it would be disappointing for the initial customers. This is one of the major reasons, why most people say to wait for 1-2 years, when Tata or Mahindra launch a new model.
Combining a performance hike along with the emission norms upgradation (transition from BS4 to BS6) is acceptable, but not in between the regular life cycle. I suggest a model should be held on to at least for 5-6 years, so that parts availability and resale value is upheld even after it is phased out.
Examples of staged/phase-wise launches, from Tata:
Tiago MT, 2016 & Tiago AMT, 2017
Nexon MT, 2017 & Nexon AMT, 2018
Harrier MT, 2019 & Harrier AT(TC), 2020
Examples of staged/phase-wise launches, from Mahindra:
XUV500 MT, 2011 & XUV500 AT(TC), 2016
XUV300 MT, 2019 & XUV300 AMT, 2019 later
On the contrary, Kia did an all options flat out, with the Seltos:
Seltos Petrol 1.5lit. MPi - MT & CVT
Seltos Petrol 1.4lit. GDi - MT & DCT
Seltos Diesel 1.5lit. CRDi - MT & AT(TC)
With price ranging from ~10L to ~18L. All of this in one go - in 2019.
I feel Mahindra need to benchmark the launch pattern of Kia Seltos for its new-gen Thar. Delay 3-4 months, if required, but launch the Petrol & Diesel, Manual & Auto, Soft Top & Hard Top, all other variants/options available in one go. One individual/family would be buying only one variant, but it is a feel-good factor when there are a lot of options to choose from and it sure gives them assurance that the model is fully baked and here to stay.
Plus spread the pricing to start from 10L onwards, for the barebones Diesel & Petrol MT version with only AC, PS, ABS & SRS, so that the Thar would be an easily procurable vehicle for use as a lifestyle vehicle. And the next higher version (top-end) with the comfort features and 4WD for those who want to go real off-roading.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zaheermk I feel they should price this vehicle starting from 10L - 15L (obviously excluding the above dealer level accessories).
I also feel they should not look to make high profit margins from this vehicle. Rather they should use this vehicle to retain/recreate their brand’s glory. |
I also think there need be only two levels (base, T4 and top-end, T8) in all the four variants, suggested in my above post.
So, Petrol Auto T4 & T8
Petrol Manual T4 & T4
Diesel Auto T4 & T8
& Diesel Manual T4 & T8.
On second thought, 10L might be too much (I mean, too less a price) to ask for, since the present Thar itself retails at 10L. So, this being a larger vehicle with a longer list of features, a starting price of 12L (till 18L for the top-end?), would be more realistic. But it is to be noted that, the higher the price of the base variant goes up, the farther the Thar brand becomes away from the reach of the common-folk Thar enthusiasts. With the features shown in photos/posts above mine, I think the new gen Thar can easily become an aspirational competitor to the compact/SUVs like Creta, Seltos, Compass etc.
Not sure, but terrain mode selection (Auto, Mud, Sand, Snow, Rock), like in the Compass, might be too much to ask for at this price point. Again, if safety regulations permit, I would like the new Thar to also have foldable windshield (which should be possible at customer end), so that it can also be used as a fully Open Top vehicle (both jeeps in the below images have four front facing seats, similar to how it could be in the new Thar). I mean, this vehicle should be able to be applied in multiple use cases, in whichever way, a customer chooses to use it as a lifestyle vehicle.