Re: The 2013 Skoda Octavia | Views of an Unofficial Expert Thanks Doc saab, Ardy and Pratik (all 3 unofficial experts) for the reviews. Wonderful to get a sneak preview with the "man on the street" point of view instead of the turgid "official" ones.
I have owned a Skoda Laura since early 2007 till last week. I was so thrilled with the car and more than satisfied with the spares and service situation that my next car is a Skoda too! Just in case anyone is wondering how much experience I have with my Skoda, let it suffice to say that my Skoda took me from Central/South India where I live to the Easternmost state of India in India's far flung North-east once and twice to the Northernmost district in India. It has taken me all over South India from beaches to hill-stations. It has taken me to the western most state in India. It has taken me through the searing heat of the Thar desert in May to sub-zero temperatures of the high mountain passes of the Himalayas. It has taken me from Sea level to over 18,000 ft above. All without skipping a beat and in absolute comfort and security. It never once developed a creak or rattle and would purr along returning a great FE and one memorable occasion went a 1000km without refuelling. It was therefore no wonder that I was excited about the new Octy being launched, that too an Octy which was received with great critical acclaim for driving dynamics, handling and engine as well as driver and cabin comfort.
In fact, I was all set to go in for the car under review, the new Octy Diesel but, providence and Ardy here provided me with a Superb 3600cc NA petrol with AWD so I will not be buying the Octy for now.
About the so called perception about Skoda so prevalent on the internet, the market of the real world does not seem to share that perception, When I sold my old Skoda last week after 6 1/2 years I still got more than 45% of the initial price I paid which is fantastic value retention considering that most cars lose 50% of their value in about 3 to 4.5 years.
About the ASS of Skoda: I have been to more Skoda ASCs than people would imagine. Not because any of them were bad but because my Skoda has been throughout the country from the Southern most bits of mainland India to India's Northernmost village, from the far flung North Eastern 7 sisters to the Western borders. To recount some of the ASCs that I have been to - I have visited the ASCs in Hyderabad, Vijayawada, Aurangabad, Guwahati, Amritsar, Surat, Udaipur & Jammu and I have found all of them excellent. Yes, there was a problem with one or two dealers particularly the old one (now terminated) in Bombay and perhaps Poona and some in NCR.
There are a few things of the car under review that came to my mind as I read the reports of the three who test drove it and comments that I thought I would share with you:
The trim levels (at least in the UK) are S, SE and Elegance (L&K only on the Superb). The Indian "Elegance" seems to be more like the SE trim level in the UK. Even with the Octy II (Laura) the L&K I had was more akin to the Elegance in the UK and was not the L&K in UK. Seems to be a local decision.
The multi-link rear is provided on the top end Diesel abroad but in India Skoda has decided to go with the torsion beam. In addition to cost-saving to Skoda there might just be another reason. The multi-link suspension has a lot of rubber parts (bushes, mountings etc.) which tend to wear out and require replacement. I remember changing the stabiliser bar bushes on my Octy II at least twice. The torsion beam does not have any such parts which require replacement so maintenance cost for the owner comes down too. Is this indicative of Skoda's heightened sensitivity to Indian customers obsession with low maintenance costs? On the other hand, IIRC only the vRS and the Elegance (Diesel) in UK came with the multi-link not the SE & S, so just maybe they carried over that spec as in any case the Indian Elegance seems to be the SE.
The TPM (tyre pressure monitor) of Skoda works fine and is quite sensitive. So the "puncture" reported by the test drivers might have been a nail/screw in the tyre which started a slow leak. On my Laura, I often got that warning without any visual signs of a puncture and only a closer examination of the tyre revealed the embedded foreign material.
Regarding the brouhaha on the reversing camera: I prefer the sensors, I have driven cars with cameras in addition to my own that had the sensor system. My Laura L&K had parking sensors front and back (as does my Superb) and the inputs these systems give to the drivers via the display on the dash + the AUDIO beeps is way superior to anything that a camera can give. One does not even have to look at the screen but can keep eyes on the 3 RVMs and listen to the beeps to reverse into or move out of a tight space.
Some features that impressed me in the EU version was the driver alert feature (driver fatigue detector) which seems to be absent in the Indian versions, the lane assist and some other knick-knacks that I would have loved to have.
I spoke to the Skoda technicians here and they confirm that the new Octy in India comes with the new Diesel engines, this means that they have been de-tuned via the maps in the ECU from their Euro specs. (The petrol 1.8 however is the same as does service on the Superb etc). I am fascinated with these new Diesel engines as they seem to develop much more power and torque than similar engines the same size and for the first time each of the cams controls one intake and one exhaust valve per chamber, because the valves are laid out diagonally instead of the traditional side by side pattern which I presume helps the engine breathe better.
I am absolutely disgusted that the passenger seat does not have height adjustment.
If what Ardy says is true that one cannot adjust the cruise control speed via the stalks, then it is a major shortcoming.
I was absolutely disappointed with the electro-mech power steering. Somehow the electronics do not give the level of feedback that the hydraulic ones offer. No amount of correction and 'weight' for speed can replace that 'feel'.
About the tyre size - my Laura came with 205/55 R16 and the profile's 112.75mm sidewall was adequate. I later moved to 225/50 profile tyres and their lower 112.5mm did not hamper comfort or handling nor get punctured. The 225/55 size tyres with their 123.75mm sidewalls however did impact handling without any gains in comfort or puncture protection. So the tyre section (205 or 225) or the profile (50% or 55% of the section) were not as important as the compounds used and the construction of the tyre. IMHO the there is nothing wrong with the stock tyre sizes but as Ardy pointed out, better compounds will help traction, braking and cornering. |