After all my ranting against tubeless tyres on steel rims in this thread, I finally took the plunge -- and fitted the stock size (155/70 R 13) Bridgestone S322 tubeless tyres to my Santro with the exisiting 6-year old steel rims.
Thanks to all T-BHPians for their inputs -- this forum was very useful in arriving at my decision. In particular, Rehaan and Buffettfan -- I will concede the point that tubeless tyres on steel rims, while not the most ideal combination, are still better than tubed tyres on steel rims. Till the last minute I was totally confused as to what I should do and I was toying with the idea of alloys+size upgrade (165/65 R13). Here is the rationale for what I ended up doing and my experience so far (sorry for the long post).
Alloys -- the main problem is getting a good fit, apart from the cost. I thought I would go with Samurai's experience and fit the same alloys (Aura C 8350, PCD 100, offset 40 mm) to my Santro, but I found out from the dealer that the new Santro Xing (which Samurai has) has different wheels from the old Santro. Apparently the old Santro will need PCD 114 mm -- I am not sure if this info is correct -- the dealer may be talking garbage for all I know. When I asked the dealers about what the offset is for the old Santro -- they didn't know it (some of them didn't know what offset means). So I decided I will not take a chance, since high speed handling may get affected plus other long term damage may occur if I mess around with the offset.
My existing rims are 6 years old -- but the Unitread (East street) mechanic insisted that I will have no problems with rusting and advised tubeless. In fact there is a little bit of rusting in my rims, but not in the bead area. So far the pressures are holding OK.
Why didn't I upsize the tyres and why the S322, rather than the superior Turanza? While an upsize (to 165/65 R 13), even with steel rims, will improve the grip and handling (at the expense of ride and FE), I felt that the stock size will fit the stock rims (4JX13) much better -- less chance of air leaking and the tyres coming off rims when hitting huge potholes. Secondly, my old Santro is already under-powered -- so the high end performance (especially top speed) is bound to come down with upsized tyres unless further modifications are made -- but I think upsize is a good idea for the Xing. I have decided against modifications--- I plan to wait for the diesel Santro (1.1 lit, 75 BHP), likely to roll out in 2007 or 2008.
The S322 is an all-season tyre with probably longer life than the softer performance tyres like the Turanza -- this plus the fact that the tougher S322 is less likely to tear when I hit potholes on the Mumbai - Pune route, which I take every week -- are the main reasons for my preferring S322.
Finally, regarding performance -- I just drove yesterday from Pune to Mumbai. I drove *very* slowly on the horrible Hadapsar-Katraj road, the Pune bypass road and the Sion-Panvel highway -- danced around all the potholes -- didn't hit a single one -- took 3.5 hours against my usual 2 hrs 45 mins for the 174 km drive under these road conditions. But on the Expressway in the rain I hit 110-120 most of the time and 120-130 in certain stretches. The handling, as compared to my old tubed S322 tyres, is unbelievably better in wet conditions. The sharp, long-winding left turn in the Lonawala ghat section was taken at 80 kmph in *wet* conditions -- amazingly, absolutely no noise from the tyres and the grip was rock-solid. Secondly, at 120-130 kmph, the car was holding its line beautifully -- no aquaplaning, now swaying -- whereas with the old tyres (with about 2-3mm tread left) the car was virtually skating around in the Expressway under wet conditions-- and upon hitting puddles with the old tyres, the car was at times pulling hard in either direction. Why would I ever want to do better than this in a car like the 1-lit Santro? So really no point in going for performance tyres -- much more pragmatic to stick to the tough, durable, safer-on-potholes S322.
So here is a tip -- do not wait until the tread comes down to 2-3mm -- change your tyres well before that -- it is worth the extra cost -- and go tubeless if you are willing to take extra care to drive carefully on bad roads (and deal with other hassles like finding good puncture repair shops and checking tyre pressures frequently, etc.).
The original advice I got last November from Speedsatya and Shan2nu to change the tyres immediately was spot-on. I stretched my old tubed tyres to almost 6 years (and 34000 kms) and in the process took a needless risk by wearing out the tread to 2-3mm, plus the lower grip due to aging rubber. Only my good driving reflexes saved me from disaster in the rain on the Expressway (with the old worn-out tyres) -- on a couple of occasions when the car violenlty pulled to the right after hitting water puddles.
One last point -- I think on tubeless tyres, especially with steel rims, it is very important to check tyre pressures frequently (at least once a week) and also check and adust them when the tyres are cold. The air pressures will not hold up as well as in tubed tyres or with alloys, because of the rusting problem (as pointed out by Rehaan). I also believe that the air inside tubeless tyres will get more easily heated up because it is directly in contact with the steel rims, which can get very hot--the added insulation of the tubes is not available. I set the tyre pressures to 30 psi just after driving back from the tyre shop (the morons had set my spare tyre to 41 psi and other tyres were reading only 28 psi). But the next day under cold, rainy conditions, the pressures on all four tyres had dropped by 1-2 psi. I have to see if this is due to leakage from my old rims, but I think it is more likely to be due to the heat factor. If the leakage is too much, I have no optionn but to switch to alloys -- will report on this after 1-2 weeks. |