Quote:
Originally Posted by rhandle |
This is a modified G Wagen with a cabin, you will have to fabricate a stand on the roof, how about the form factor? Will it look good?
After having driven the Gurkha ,do you not feel the need to change the rear view mirrors to something substantitial ,given the size of the vehicle and the rear visibility?
I am ordering chrome rear view mirrors for both the sides,similiar to the ones fixed on the G Wagen.
I have no plans to change my tyres yet,I think they are good enough.
I had a few problems with my Gurkha in the initial 1400 kms( The vehicle had already done 950 km when it reached me).The Gear-shift was hard and the 4 wheel gear shaft was stuck. The left rear suspension leaf springs were slightly misaligned giving the vehicle a grating sound when turning corners.
As you had advised me I asked the technician to tighten all the bolts and nuts,however none of them were loose(Thank God).
Guess what was the problem with the 4WD shaft?
The gear knob indicating the positions of the various gears was turned clockwise by 15 degrees and try as I might I couldnt shift the gears. funny isnt it?

I am impressed with the Gurkha's cornering capabilities and the superb turning radius( as you rightly said --turns like a zen).
I havent had the opportunity yet to see its off-road capability. Whilst it's hard to believe that I couldnt even make out on the phone that you were in your Gurkha driving merrily and talking to me the other day.Not much noise in the cabin.
So far I have encountered a lot of bewildered faces when they have a look at the Gurkha..many thought the front snorkel was a modification I had carried out for cosmetic reasons.Once while I was at the Toll-tax booth ,many crowded around to ask me about the vehicle,its make ,price etc.No matter how tired I am I am always glad to answer these questions.
A friend of mine,builder by occupation,driving to his sites off-city in undeveloped areas took a great fancy for the Gurkha after he drove mine one day.He drives a Safari and was impressed with the "bad-road" drive comfort of the Gurkha.The quality that impressed him was the significantly less "side to side" roll. He too has instantly booked a Gurkha.
I don't know Rahul why people on this thread have commented that the Gurkha is expensive.
I guess "looks" count and not the "character".
Doesn't a vehicles stability ,sturdiness,driveability and functionality score over its form factor and plush interior?
There also is a issue of acceptability.The media has never projected this vehicle in any way,just as with the Safari,Scorpio,Xylo etc.The concept has never been marketed. Think about the suzuki Wagon -R. Great engine,comfort,interiors but a difficult to accept "form" could also make it good, why?
Marketing off-course.
I own a cardiac Ambulance built over a TATA 201.
I asked my fabricator to have a look at the Gurkha and asked his suggestions for interior refurbishment.The entire package of plush reclining seats(with handles),carpet, sound reduction adaptations and modified dashboard could come to around a lakh(The Gurkha already comes with a powerful A/C and PS).That could make the Gurkha's cost around 9,50,000/- The 4 WD Safari costs more than 12,000,00/- on road.
If you compare
this Gurkha with the Safari,then wouldnt the safari prove costlier? The 4WD functionality, highest GC, lower turning radius,tubular chasis, the thicker steel,the differential locks,the insane 3 year warranty of the Gurkha beats the safari in all departments, excepting the central locking system,puddle lamps,available colors,remote lock etc?
I am not here to prove which vehicle is better I am only trying to suggest that the Gurkha is definitely not
"very expensive".
There are other Gurkha issues discussed on this thread to which I humbly disagree which I will discuss .