Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadVagabond Hello Harjeev, Well no Canon doesn't always launch upgrades like they did this time. It's because of the mounting pressure from Nikon with their new models they had to do this time. Otherwise, it usually takes about a year and half to two years to do so. If you are very serious about photography then I'd suggest you to go for a 40D for now and then maybe someday upgrade to a full frame later on. But, for now if you just need a DSLR to bring up the bar on your photography then go ahead with a DSLR like 450D. The XXD series of Canon like the 40D/50D are semi-pro camera's and are not really meant for amateurs. They are for those who demand that extra punch. It's more logical for someone to start with a base model and then upgrade than buying an expensive model right now and ending up with loosing interest in the hobby. |
Thanks Aniban for taking the time to clear my doubts.
Well I'd say that I am serious about photography but again as an amateur and I am still in the learning process.
I upgraded last year to a Canon S5 from a point & Shoot Sony bought in 2002.
Further I have also started to experiment with the manual settings compared my earlier shooting styles which was always done in the auto mode.
So my idea is to first ascertain the limitations in the S5 and then migrate to a DSLR. This way I would know what I really want my camera to do, rather to just buy on a hunch.
And whenever I take the plunge, I do not want to invest in a very expensive body but will like to buy good lenses, which currently I have not idea about.
I believe that all lenses and be mounted in different cameras.
Like if I decided to go with Canon 450 D and buy a good quality lens,
so later whenever I upgrade, can I retain the lens or will have to buy new lenses.
I know its a foolish question, but I am a novice |