Quote:
Originally Posted by extreme_torque huh... even at base ISO its a no match. |
The pics are specially for you my friend.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai That one had APS-C size sensor, but was expensive as hell. That doesn't win the VFM prize. I am wondering about the prosumer camera
that is cheaper the dSLR yet provides better image quality. Let's wait for NomadVagabond for that. |
Yes sir, here are your questions answered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by navin Some years ago Sony came out with a 2/3" sensor camera with a 24-120 fixed lens called the R1 (I think). I compared this camera's output
to a Canon 40D with a 17-55/2.8 and 70-200/2.8 lenses on a Sony 46" X series television. The results were apparent. We did not expect the results to be apparent but evene the owner of the R1 was surprised. |
@ Navin
Well the R1 was a revolutionary camera on it's own. It's known as one of the first prosumer (Bridge) camera's around. Let's not keep our conversation limited to just Sony. Sony otherwise is very popular for its cybershot series which is infact a good compact camera for it's price and variety of models available. There are other brands like Canon/Nikon/Kodak & Panasonic. Infact some of the prosumers which are making very good camera's. I'm posting a few photographs taken by a very close friend of mine who's also a photographer "by choice" and uses a Prosumer Lumix Panasonic FZ-18 which inherits its optics from the legendary Leica. Which is now pretty outdated as well. But, please take a look at the quality of the photographs. One of them has infact been featured in an Italian fashion magazine. I've taken his permission for posting the photographs from him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by navin Becasue even a Nikon D40 mated to the 18-55/55-200 lens combo will whip a $600-700 Prosumer camera like the Fuji S100fs. |
Fuji made films not camera's. Let's not get confused. Today every company is making digital camera's just because they were somehow involved with
photography and now their core business is out of business. Like Fuji closed it's film production.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai This is interesting, I have not been watching the prosumer camera scene for a while one. Can you name couple of prosumer cameras that can beat entry level dSLRs in image quality and price? |
As mentioned above. You can check Canon S5IS, Canon Sx10IS, Lumix FZ-18, Nikon coolpix L100, Nikon Coolpix L90. All these camera's are good ones which are both value for money as well as will solve most needs for a normal person not wanting more than a good shot. Yes, for those who desire that extra kick there's the DSLR's to pick from.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpullockaran As mentioned earlier for those who are into serious photography they should opt for and stick to full frame sensors which means the first option would be the D700 in my book. If they have deeper pockets the sky is the limit but I still maintain that its better to spend on lenses once we reach the ability to afford the cheapest full frame sensor based camera. |
Dear sir, If investing in the cheapest full frame DSLR was really the case then well the obvious choice should've been Canon 5D and not Nikon D700!! If prices are to be compared check these links
Canon in South and Southeast Asia and scroll down to Canon 5D which costs INR 124995.00 while on
Camshot :- importing & distributing high quality Photographic goods | Digital Camera(s) Canon, Olympus, Nikon, Panasonic Digicam | Digital Camera Accessories | Buy Digital Camera Nikon D700 is listed with bill (In RED) as INR 155000.00/- Maybe my maths was too weak in school but I definitely find 5D much cheaper! You might say that Nikon D700 is a much newer camera and hence the higher price. Isn't the Nikon D40 an old camera hence the low price tag? And lol Nikon doesn't even display the MRP prices on their official websites. And well lets not be a brand fanboy. When we are talking about cheap camera's then lets be unbiased about it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpullockaran
EOS 5D vs. EOS 20D - Full Frame vs. APS-C Sensors - Bob Atkins Photography Its like advicing on amplifiers. Once we reach ClassA amplification or Tube amplififers its better to spend on ultra expensive speakers rather than on costlier Class A amps or tube based amps. |
I'll reply in the same terminology. Please kindly notice I'm not a motorhead by choice but by option while I'm a photographer by choice not by option. So, to compare a Canon 5D with a Canon 20D is like comparing Honda Civic with Honda City. Both, belonging to the same stables but from different class. So, with due respect to Mr. Bob Atkins I am sorry to state that had they compared it with some other full frame sensor camera then it'd have made some sense. Right now it doesn't.
One more thing which Mr. Atkins failed to point out is that there's a 3rd size of sensor too. APS-H size (Not considering the 4/3'rd sizes which are followed by some few manufacturers). From which only the Canon 1D MKIII belongs to.
Each camera is built for a purpose and clientele. While the APS-c size is for the amateurs who want to start with photography using a DSLR in the basic entry level segment. And it also goes into the camera's meant for action photography like wildlife and sports. Because of a simple reason that APS-C size offers a natural 1.6x FOV crop which gives the picture a bit larger than it was already. APS-H size goes in for exclusively high speed action photography again for wildlife and sports. And the full frame 35mm goes in for landscapes and portraits (Fashion)etc. Each segment has a top of the line camera from both Canon/Nikon and both brands are very capable of pulling out excellent photographs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpullockaran Sensor capabilities of compact prosumer cameras with puny sensors cannot compare with the cheapest DSLR cameras which have the APS-C sensor. The only exception to this is the compact camera from Sigma but the cost is prohibitive.
Sigma announces DP2 large sensor compact. |
Totally agree to that. No, wonder Sigma is so popular with their camera's. That even their Indian flagship retailer Shetala Camera doesn't even display it on their site. With 8 pages of different digital camera's (Compact/Prosumers) only 1 Sigma is featured there. Let's face the reality. Sigma is NOT known for its camera's but for it's lenses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drpullockaran The NikonD40 is not out of the lineup atleast in India.
Nikon India Private Limited |
No wonder it's not listed on Camshot.in which is one of the major suppliers for Professional DSLR's in India and JJ Mehta has it listed as "Limited Stock". FYI it's not being imported by Nikon India Pvt. Ltd. anymore. You can call up dealers around your place and see how easily Nikon D40 is available. One more proof for that is
Nikon D40 digital camera specifications: Digital Photography Review under the affiliate merchants section it's clearly mentioned "No merchants currently list this product". It's almost a 3yr old model!! How long would one drag it around?

Even being a Canon user myself I'd never suggest anyone to go buy a Canon 350D which is not easily available anymore.
P.S: Photography is an art. It's not limited by the equipment. Sometimes a simple pin-hole camera might produce the most amazing photograph which a Hassleblad might fail to take. After all the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.
I think I've said enough. And If I've hurt someone's sentiments or feelings. I'm extremely sorry for that. I tried to keep the conversation extremely neutral.
Regards,
Anirban.