Quote:
Originally Posted by huntrz Exactly, and that's why he portrays India with jammed nallahs, people emerging from ****, carving an eye out for begging, prostitution, police giving electric shocks to people as a daily routine, people laughing at a chaiwala at KBC. Just the way westerners perceive India, and what the jury at toronto film festival would like India to be portrayed as. Slumdon asks for sandwich when hungry, which clearly tells whom the movie has been made for. I mean would a guy who rose from the slums crave for sandwiches and muffins when hungry?
While portraying India they forget the Indian middle class which is larger than the entire US population and stck to poverty, human rights violation etc. Not that these donot occur here but there is more to India. No this is not the demand of the story, this is the demand of the target audience for whom the movie was made, sitting at western film festivals. How many films depict the dark side of the west or is it free from vices? Why do they send lagaan to Oscars but not RDB, because RDB doesnot portray indians as poor and oppressed and this wouldn't sound palatable to international jury. Basically Boyle has played safe.
Not trying to argue or hurt anyone but trying to see things from a different angle. Personally I found the movie disgusting the way it shows India. the direction and photography however were intelligent. |
I would strongly disagree with you on this point. First things first, the movie is not a documentary so basically it is not exactly portraying India as some people are making it out to be. It's a story about a person who lived his childhood in midst of slums and was proverty stricken. Unfortunately that person happened to be from India. So no need to get our inflated ego hurt that someone showed our dirty linen in public.
Secondly, don't all these things really happen in India? Blinding people for begging, people living in slums, riots etc etc? If someone has shown that then what's wrong in it? And what would anyone expect a slum dweller to have? A Beemer or Merc to carry the rags, or a palace to live and 5 course dinner? What shown was very hard-hitting truth for us.
Didn't we started eating burgers and pizzas afer we moved to big cities? Whereas as a child we even haven't heard about them. So what's wrong about the Don asking for Sandwiches? Things does change with time. And about westerner's perceiving India, well things have changed quite a bit in last few decades.
About laughing at the chaiwala, may be it was bit far-fetched the way it was shown. But ask yourself, do we have respect for all kind of work? I mean, we still have status attached to one's work. We still have our differences. Our behaviour changes depending on the status of that person we are talking to. There are many such examples and we are still not egalitarian society in India, yet. I know many have changed but we still have a long way to go before we start respecting all kind of work as equal.
And about the west not depicting it's dark side? oh come on, they did, in many movies. Have you seen "Pursuit of happiness"? Does that mean that everyone in US is leaving poor and have to think about finding a shelter everyday as the protagonist of that movie did? Or is there a killer like Cigurah lurking around the westerns to kill people cold blooded like it shown in "No country for old men"? These may not be very good examples but at these this is what came to my mind.
The movie does have flaws, many of them, so I won't call it a masterpiece. But nevertheless it's a very entertaining movie and realistic in many parts.
And sorry if I've hurt you or anyone with my comments, but after reading so many jingoistic comments about the movie(not just here but in other forums too) I just couldn't stopped myself from posting.