Quote:
Originally Posted by shancz Congratulations Poitive
This was a pleasant surprise, I can partly feel the excitement too. |
Thanks for being a valuable companion along this hunt which was a mix of excitement, enjoyment, but also some frustration. That you too feel the excitement is an indication of your level of involvement in the process
. Much appreciated, shancz mate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RijuC Many many congratulations Poitive for this big news on the anniversary date.
We shall be waiting for the ownership write-up. |
Thank you mate. Just might take a little longer than anticipated, to write the Ownership Report.
I hope you too soon figure out and go ahead with your purchase.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kosfactor Congratulations Poitive, tank up and enjoy. Please do let us know more, pictures are welcome but a long post for us to read is certainly in order. |
Thanks mate, surely doing that already. You'll get more than a long post - an ownership report.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DicKy At last. Looking forward to see which one was selected finally.
This thread has become the sort of go to one for the hottest vehicle segment today, and I am sure there are many others who will find the discussions here helpful. |
Thanks for sharing the happiness, mate. Am happy to hear that the thread is seen such.
Folks, please allow me some time for the ownership report. Not being able to take out as much time as I'd like, and want to finish the half-done TD report first. I also tend to prioritize selection of others, where the time spend might have a more direct use, as in the case of RijuC.
~~~~~~
Quote:
Originally Posted by RijuC You explained it nicely. With less experience, this short window becomes shorter. I read your analysis thoroughly and that is the reason behind all my queries here. |
From what I understand, the
experience part too is correct. Cars designed and tuned for motorsport professionals are with a shorter window for correction, as they can manage with it. They would rather have other driving characteristics as a trade-off.
Regarding your fatigue point: please refer to the long TD report I posted a while back in this thread.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RijuC With a heavy heart, I have decided to cancel the Scorpio N, primarily because of the following reasons:
...
2. Suitability for hills, mountains: I understand from the discussions and suggestions that the Scorpio N is not suitable for hills and mountains for my lesiure trips... |
I am sure the Scorpio N would be extensively used in the hills, and will almost certainly be a popular vehicle. Am just trying to put my views in perspective, since it appeared that one of the influences for your questions here was my post earlier.
The vehicle should be understood for what it is, and one should not get carried away with the marketing talk, and the like (some will be found always appreciating or ridiculing a certain brand). Also to realize it's
relative strengths and weaknesses vis a vis other options in the market; the word
relative being key here. For me, clearly a low CoG vehicle would have an advantage in many situations, but as before others can be driven by simply driving slower and with more caution.
The Scorpio N Z4 does have ESP, right? That is some insurance itself. I haven't kept myself updated enough for some time, and just saw the GNCAP video of the Scorpio N (which prompted this post too), and surprisingly it was upright in the side impact test. That said, as before, I do not see star ratings as the ultimate mark of safety - there is much more. (See how a poorly designed high CoG vehicle can end up in tests which are not a part of the protocol here.) Things like feedback, driver connect etc, of course, aren't measured in such tests, nor is the ability of the vehicle to be maneuvered properly in tight situations.
The "chipak ke" feeling and taking tight turns at speeds where one feels the centrifugal force significantly is not for high CoG BoF vehicles. That is best left to sedans and hatchbacks. Recollecting the drive video you shared earlier, something with big tyres would work well for you. Needs which pull things in opposite directions. A Harrier with it's lower CoG for the segment, is a good balance, and comes with an HPS, but alas only available in Diesel. Kicks, which too had these traits and had petrol is apparently on the way out (or already is). That is why I talked about the XUV 700, which might be somewhere midway between them and the Scorpio N. Do consider the AX3. The price difference divided by 15 years might mean a small monthly amount (something I ran through my head for my own case too). A part of which might be recovered by better FE.
The other one which fits the needed balance is an XUV 300. Even in manual mode, it is clutchless so your legs would not be troubled. You will also get the extra control a manual vehicle provides. It came across as a well thought out design in the limited time I spent with it. A good variant should also come well within your original budget. A good size for your kind of usage too, though with all 4/5 passengers the luggage space would be a concern.
PS: Came up in a discussion, and is probably well known that car prices often increase in January. Further, those looking at
diesel vehicles, might want to hurry. With the next version of BS6 coming up, the hardware cost is said to increase significantly and will consequently raise prices.
~~~~~~~
Jeep Wrangler 4-door driver-side small overlap crash test by IIHS
2019 model: The vehicle actually flips over at a 40mph (~64kmph)!!!
So, what next? Jeep tries to improve it. The result below.
2022 model:
So much for Jeep's engineering prowess. The 2013 model, surprisingly, did not have this issue.