Team-BHP > Shifting gears > Gadgets, Computers & Software
Register New Topics New Posts Top Thanked Team-BHP FAQ


Reply
  Search this Thread
3,592,117 views
Old 19th January 2010, 13:36   #2821
Senior - BHPian
 
_raVan_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pune
Posts: 1,073
Thanked: 660 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by tsk1979 View Post
Get VPT 3662. Its sturdy and big. Good enough for basic needs.
Costs around 1500rs, and is available at most photography shops!
Thanks for the prompt response. I have short listed the same and some others quoted below (though it is from Amazon US, I wonder if it is available in India)

a) Amazon.com: Canon Deluxe 200 Tripod: Camera & Photo

b) Amazon.com: Dolica AX620B100 62-Inch Proline Tripod and Ball Head: Camera & Photo

c) Amazon.com: Vista Explorer 60" Lightweight Tripod with Tripod Bag: Camera & Photo

Please advice.
_raVan_ is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 13:48   #2822
Senior - BHPian
 
mobike008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 12,004
Thanked: 17,199 Times

I recently bought a Vivitar ( forgot the model number). It is quite sturdy and can take the weight of a DSLR and heavy lens and has ball feets for better grip even on uneven surfaces.

It costed Rs.900/-only and i am satisfied.
mobike008 is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 16:19   #2823
Senior - BHPian
 
shajufx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,808
Thanked: 832 Times

I am sure the topic of 'Shutter count' might have been discussed somewhere in this thread, but due to the number of pages, its not easy to find a significant post related to this.

I was curious to know my D60 status as many comments are seen in different forums cautioning the new buyers about the refurbished body (used camera sold as new one) in the grey market. Now here is what I used and found. Does it sound normal ?

I bought my D60: 21st May 2009
Link used: Jeffrey's Exif viewer
Shutter count on a photo taken on 22nd May 2009 : 352
Shutter count as of today: 2616

Gurus, please put your views, it might help every new buyer in the market to avoid or to be more careful about grey market products.
shajufx is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 16:29   #2824
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 26,014
Thanked: 50,162 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by mobike008 View Post
I recently bought a Vivitar ( forgot the model number). It is quite sturdy and can take the weight of a DSLR and heavy lens and has ball feets for better grip even on uneven surfaces.

It costed Rs.900/-only and i am satisfied.
Well, the term quite sturdy is relative. I have a Manfrotto (190DB + 486RC) which cost me 8.5K about 4 years back. Once Rudra used it for whole day with his 1Ds and 70-200 2.8 IS lens. Most of his shots had shakes despite the gentle breeze. There was nothing wrong with the tripod, it just wasn't sturdy enough for the equipment.
Samurai is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 16:50   #2825
Senior - BHPian
 
mobike008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 12,004
Thanked: 17,199 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai View Post
Well, the term quite sturdy is relative. I have a Manfrotto (190DB + 486RC) which cost me 8.5K about 4 years back. Once Rudra used it for whole day with his 1Ds and 70-200 2.8 IS lens. Most of his shots had shakes despite the gentle breeze. There was nothing wrong with the tripod, it just wasn't sturdy enough for the equipment.
Sure, that's possible. I was just outlining my experience which wasn't too bad. My equipment being a humble Nikon D40x with 70-300mm Tamaron Tele-photo.
mobike008 is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 17:10   #2826
Team-BHP Support
 
Samurai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bangalore/Udupi
Posts: 26,014
Thanked: 50,162 Times

I suspect Vivitar to be too feeble for even Nikon D40x with 70-300mm. Light tripods are very susceptible to breeze.
Samurai is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 17:15   #2827
Team-BHP Support
 
tsk1979's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 23,689
Thanked: 23,495 Times

Thats why I suggested 3662, the 6 feet heaviest vivitar.
The trick is not to extend it fully, but only to half its length(with just one section extended). It will be around 4 feet in height then, and good in breeze.
I use the model one stage below this one.
In breeze I do not extend it at all, therefore I get a tripod just 1.5 feet in height, but it suffices, and even in good breeze, it is sturdy. However, if I extend it, then it goes for a toss!

Once I had to extend it in breeze, and it was shakey. So I hung the camera bag(with lenses etc.,) on the hook provided below the center, and everything was good!
tsk1979 is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 18:11   #2828
BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 24
Thanked: 0 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by navin View Post
Is the 18-270 as good as the 18-55+55-250 (Canon) combo?......
I have only used it once and found it a good superzoom lens. Had the chance to try it at few tennis matches and it was quite good. Yes there is a bit of distortion but then again its expected.

m4/3 benefit both from small flange distance and 2x crop factor and obvious ommision of viewfinder. But if nikon and canon make then smaller following m4/3 they are no longer DSLR, they are EVIL cameras.

By Cheap knock offs i meant bogen, victory, Goldphoto, BH, Benro, explorer, Amvona, etc. Bogen is part of Manfrotto but its cheaper, most of these have 1-2yr older designs with almost same finish. Some also pop up on ebay without names.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Samurai View Post
Well, the term quite sturdy is relative......
+1

Tripod is one of the most ignored piece of equipment. To be honest there is no point even buying some lightweight carbon Fibre tripod. Get a decent Manfrotto or a knock off and then add sand bags in the middle.

I do have 3-4 cheap crappy tripods but they are used for reflectors and i mean small reflectors. I found myself needing these to mount few polished mirrors for light bending.


Quote:
Originally Posted by fatboyslim View Post
Saw a mind boggling deal from ebay international......
D90 is not going anywhere anytime soon. To be honest i dont think the deal is that good. I would suggest get D90+twin kit lens. Other stuff, well DealExtreme: Cool Gadgets at the Right Price - Site-Wide Free Shipping (Page 1) will take care of

Also the lenses are not good compared to Kit lenses and Wide angle and 2x TC are not worth $2. They will degrade image quality.

Cheers
it_inspector is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 21:38   #2829
BHPian
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Delhi
Posts: 271
Thanked: 11 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by shajufx View Post
I am sure the topic of 'Shutter count' might have been discussed somewhere in this thread, but due to the number of pages, its not easy to find a significant post related to this.

I was curious to know my D60 status as many comments are seen in different forums cautioning the new buyers about the refurbished body (used camera sold as new one) in the grey market. Now here is what I used and found. Does it sound normal ?

I bought my D60: 21st May 2009
Link used: Jeffrey's Exif viewer
Shutter count on a photo taken on 22nd May 2009 : 352
Shutter count as of today: 2616

Gurus, please put your views, it might help every new buyer in the market to avoid or to be more careful about grey market products.
Though I am a complete noob, the count of 352 on the second day of buying doesnt seem ok unless you shot these many photographs in 1 day.

Experts your inputs pls!
WanderNomad is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 22:00   #2830
Senior - BHPian
 
shajufx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,808
Thanked: 832 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by WanderNomad View Post
the count of 352 on the second day of buying doesnt seem ok ..
Thats exactly the reason I posted the matter here. But I dont know how accurate this exif data reading can be. I might have clicked maximum 50 until the photo used for data reading. Still we have 300+ in question. Another possibility is the test shots done by the shop keeper or the potential buyers in a span of few months while the body was kept for sale. I remember the shop guy had clicked more than 10 snaps infront of me to show different features. Gurus might be able to throw some light on this.
shajufx is offline  
Old 19th January 2010, 22:32   #2831
Senior - BHPian
 
rkbharat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gurgaon/New Delhi
Posts: 1,603
Thanked: 724 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by shajufx View Post
Thats exactly the reason I posted the matter here. But I dont know how accurate this exif data reading can be. I might have clicked maximum 50 until the photo used for data reading. Still we have 300+ in question. Another possibility is the test shots done by the shop keeper or the potential buyers in a span of few months while the body was kept for sale. I remember the shop guy had clicked more than 10 snaps infront of me to show different features. Gurus might be able to throw some light on this.
also the most missed part is switch between viewfinder to Live View and vice-versa, which adds to shutter count each, also switching between Info View and Live view as well. Even I was bit confused that just 10-11 snaps and my shutter count was 26. Just because I switched between LV and viewfinder alot

Though 300+ is still high

Shutter count for my cam stand 735 after some 600+ snaps

Last edited by rkbharat : 19th January 2010 at 22:39.
rkbharat is offline  
Old 20th January 2010, 14:08   #2832
Senior - BHPian
 
clevermax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tvm/Amsterdam
Posts: 2,115
Thanked: 2,909 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by rkbharat View Post
also the most missed part is switch between viewfinder to Live View and vice-versa, which adds to shutter count each, also switching between Info View and Live view as well. Even I was bit confused that just 10-11 snaps and my shutter count was 26. Just because I switched between LV and viewfinder alot
Though 300+ is still high
Shutter count for my cam stand 735 after some 600+ snaps
Oh toggling between live view and back adds to shutter count? In that case I'd not be using live view even if my camera has that feature, for the feel good factor of it

1 year plus few months and my shutter count stands at 8000 :(

Have you guys calculated how much percentage of the shutter count is your keeper shots? You'll become sad after calculating that.

Last edited by clevermax : 20th January 2010 at 14:11.
clevermax is offline  
Old 20th January 2010, 20:22   #2833
BHPian
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 24
Thanked: 0 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by clevermax View Post
Oh toggling between live view and back adds to shutter count? In that case I'd not be using live view even if my camera has that feature, for the feel good factor of it

1 year plus few months and my shutter count stands at 8000 :(

Have you guys calculated how much percentage of the shutter count is your keeper shots? You'll become sad after calculating that.
Shutter is hardly significant these days. I have yet to see any non-pro hitting shutter life who bought the body brand new, bodies get sold way before that. Shutter count was significant earlier since at 1/4000 shutter speed, shutter blades experience more than 1000G force during starting and stopping. But shutter mechanisms have come a long way.

I got a D3 sitting here like a paper weight with shutter count less than 4000.

If one has to actually consider shutter count then they also need to consider live view mode, shutter speeds used, shutter speed at high burst, low burst and single shot modes. Reason being in single shot mode, shutter blades takes upto 4 times longer to travel compared to full burst mode even when shutter speed is set to 1/4000.

And 8000 is nothing, i knocked 10K in less than 3 months

Easiest way to increase number of keepers is to make sure you are framing carefully and Dont think of cropping while shooting, make it a habbit and i guarantee %age of keepers will increase.

EDIT: What i mean by framing is, not just consider the subject in the middle, follow thirds rule and think of the corners.

Cheers

Last edited by it_inspector : 20th January 2010 at 20:25.
it_inspector is offline  
Old 20th January 2010, 23:41   #2834
BHPian
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Noida
Posts: 264
Thanked: 156 Times
dslr's- the rockwell view..

Quote:
Originally Posted by gd1418 View Post
Ken & against DSLRs? Now, that is news to me. Where, on his site, did you read this?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sankar View Post

You mean Ken 'plug' Rockwell is against all DSLRs that are not Nikon
Seriously i don't think he is against DSLRs, can you post the link where you have read that.

here goes (Ken Rockwell's Updates) entries under Jan 17.

quips like: "...DSLRs are about as relevant today as dial-up modems and SCSI-conected scanners; How many cameras and what lenses did I carry for a week of shooting? Just a Canon S90. I wasn't shooting anything that moved, so I'm not wasting my time hauling either of my two D40s.

there are some other posts also somewhere on his site where he derides dslr's as too complex and how compacts are better.
maven is offline  
Old 20th January 2010, 23:46   #2835
Senior - BHPian
 
clevermax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tvm/Amsterdam
Posts: 2,115
Thanked: 2,909 Times

Quote:
Originally Posted by it_inspector View Post
Easiest way to increase number of keepers is to make sure you are framing carefully and Dont think of cropping while shooting, make it a habbit and i guarantee %age of keepers will increase.
EDIT: What i mean by framing is, not just consider the subject in the middle, follow thirds rule and think of the corners.
Cheers
Basically, compose better pictures.
clevermax is offline  
Reply

Most Viewed


Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Team-BHP.com
Proudly powered by E2E Networks