Quite a benign and rational response.

I was expecting to see some strong opinions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rranjith_kum Just one doubt isn't the Nymex crude sliding to prices below 118 $ so it will be a profit for these state owned companies right ? |
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjothi One thing I dont understand is, Oil price has reduced almost 30$ and govt talks about increasing the prices again. |
Well, even when the price was hiked by Rs.5 for petrol (and Rs.3 for diesel) when oil was around 130$ or so, it did not really make up for the huge hike from 80$ where oil was trading. So, it is not like, the petro-companies are going to see profits when oil price has now gone down to 118$.
Quote:
Originally Posted by amohit 2009 being the election yr..i doubt anything will happen. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fountainheader And I doubt the Congress would like such moves so close to the elections. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by abhinav.gupta88 I dont think this will help congress anyway with the elections so close! |
I was not implying that this will happen. Infact given the way things work in India, the recommendation will most probably end up in the trash-bin. The idea was only to have a realistic look at where we are headed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thad E Ginathom Car ownership has exploded in last few years: is it reasonable to expect government to subsidise the fuel costs? See all the new cars; should the government be contributing to their travel costs? but there should be better ways of targeting subsidy: this one seems to favour the rich! |
Yes, in the name of subsidising the poor, affordable public transportation and keeping inflation in check, we are actually subsidising the rich who if they have the means to buy a car, should also factor in the cost of buying gas for it. Especially with diesel vehicles, we are unnecessarily subsidising the affluent middle-class and the upper classes with their steeds ranging from the Swift-D at the low-end to the Mercs and BMWs in the top segment. Don't really see a need to use public money to fund part of their transportation costs.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ph03n!x Public transport will be costlier. Commodities will be costlier. Inflation will shoot up, so will my fuel bill !!! |
I bet you really dont use public transportation in the city and I am sure the costlier commodities and inflation increase is not really going to kill you like it would do to the common man. The 4th reason you mentioned is what you are really worried about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phamilyman For the last time for love of God, those cribbing of current crude prices, please ever bother to derive actual market rates versus mandated rates. Actual prices would definitely be higher. |
Yes, a very valid point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjothi The diesel price should be at par with Petrol. (Atleast for non-commercial usage) But I wonder how can they make this happen. |
This is the need of the hour, but very tough to implement when you think in terms of having different prices for different usage because then the loopholes will be exploited. Only way (though a hard measure) is to progressively remove the subsidies and bring prices to real level, for any kind of usage. Yes, inflation will rise. Yes, public transportation will become costlier. But also adulteration will go. So will wasteful usage of these resources.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjothi One more to add here is, the lines of cars that follow the political leaders vehicle in the name of security, loyaltist, party men or whatever they are called. Reduce these and see how much consumption is reducing. |
Well, initiatives should start from the top, which is only when the public will emulate them. But given the crooks we have for politicians, hell will freeze over before these guys think beyond themselves. And we are also to blame - for as is said, a people get the leaders they deserve.