Quote:
Originally Posted by vvivek85 No clear details on how it happened, based the little information it was a head-on collusion, Venue driver sustained minor injuries whereas Tiago driver unfortunately passed away. One thing is clear, irrespective of number of safety stars the car possess, its your star that will save you on that day, drive safe.
For the records Tiago is rated 4 star and Venue is not tested yet. |
The Tiago has experienced an angled collision. But the crash is more of a head-on instead of a t-bone considering the longitudinal crush of the A-pillar and little to no lateral intrusion. The narrow overlap has also ensured that the cross member has probably been bypassed.
GNCAP rating does not matter here as GNCAP does not test for angled collisions that do not involve the cross members. Unfortunately, this is something no manufacturer clarifies when selling their "safe cars".
However, I believe that Tiago's driver died due to a lack of belt usage considering the position of the belt. The intrusion is not significant to reduce his survival space. An analysis of the injuries can only confirm this though.
A thing that is bugging me is that the damages on the Venue and Tiago don't seem to correlate. Is there another vehicle involved in this case that may have also hit the Tiago?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RGK Around 3 p.m. today, this accident occurred on the Tirupur-Madurai route before Koduvai Village, which is close to the town of Dharapuram.
At a high rate of speed (>150), the XUV700 crossed the lane and struck the approaching bus. Fortunately, it was a bus. All of the occupants, who were young adults in their 30s, perished, and the XUV's engine is out on the road. Due to the hit of the XUV700, the bus's front tyre was torn off. |
Can you provide a source for the 150kph speed? If it is a witness statement, I don't think it is reliable because "150 kph" is a standard quoted speed by passers-by and police when they see heavy damage on the vehicle. I am not saying that the XUV700 is not speeding but saying that it is above 150 kph without any source is hearsay.
Quote:
Originally Posted by balenoed_ Look at the staff of the bus, it must be the livelihood for them, including the owner (if it really was a genuine business, and not of some political guy). It certainly is going to have some temporary financial burden on them too. |
Apart from financial burden, there is also this aspect of a legal/social burden. No matter who is the instigator of the crash, the charge sheet will be filed against the bus driver as he is in the "bigger vehicle". Considering the multiple fatalities the bus driver may even be looking at jail time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzy_boy IMHO, M&M executives should be more careful during their promotions, and refrain from saying anything that could induce common public to engage in reckless behaviour. |
I completely agree, sir. This also applies to Tata Motors. If the manufacturer starts promoting their vehicle as a "tank", drivers are going to drive it as a tank too. Manufacturers need to start giving the limitations of GNCAP ratings and their cars. We cannot expect the standard car buyer to be well versed in the nitty-gritty of crash tests. This practice is a double-edged sword that will hurt the manufacturers down the line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT_Hyderabad The car was driven too fast and lost control and hit the bus in such a way that the front middle portion of the car hit the corner of the bus at an angle. This impact also hit the tyre and the bus's axle broke. What broken things you see on the underside of the bus is caused by the bus's tyre and has nothing to do with the car.
The bus was also at high speed and the tyre/broken axle caused all that damage to the bus. However, I am still not able to make out from where the white paint on the side of the bus came from. It could be that the car took a 180 deg turn and the right side of the car slided against the bus before they came to a halt. |
This looks like a standard head-on underride in which the car has gone under the truck. Quite hard to say the exact collision angle as someone has taken the car to the cleaners during extrication. The damage that we see is both collision+extrication damage. It is quite hard to say that the bus was also at a high speed without inspecting the scene.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixantz Going by the statistics and how many XUV700 crashes since it's been launched, and all related to high speed, I have a strong doubt that there is an issue at speed with the vehicle which gets it out of control.
I mean, there are lot of rich people buying much more costlier SUVs with much more power than the XUV700, like BMWs, Mercs, Audi, Volvo, Jeep, etc which have 300-700 bhp power, but it's rare for any of them to have ended like these in the numbers the XUV700 is single handedly doing. |
Can you share the source of a large number of XUV700 crashes? It's certainly intriguing that the XUV700 has a higher crash rate compared to other cars.
If true, I am not sure if power is the only reason behind the high crash rate of the XUV700. There could be other reasons such as driver age group, driving experience, publicly available data (not all crashes are reported), car type, car features (luxury vehicles usually have more finely tuned safety features such as ESP, FCW), etc. Hard to make any causation without data.
Quote:
Originally Posted by p_darshi ADAS not involved in this accident
If you look closely at the wheels design, this model is not AX7. Only the top end AX7 & AX7L get ADAS related features, and hence it’s wrong to blame ADAS. I am 100% sure ADAS would have saved lives in this case. Automatic emergency braking would have certainly reduced the severity of impact |
Agreed that ADAS cannot be blamed if there is no ADAS in the vehicle. However, we cannot say for certain that ADAS would have helped here without understanding what has happened. Features such as AEB have limitations of visibility range, travel speeds, TTC threshold etc. The same goes for ESPs.