Apologies for the longish post. Please excuse reading, if you are not interested in MG or Kia, but given a lot of us here are in the same conundrum I wanted to write a detailed post. So here goes:
Well, as my Hector DCT Sharp is almost ready to be delivered and I have also booked Seltos, I am really confused on which to go for, and for that I together with my wife decided to visit both showrooms over the weekend, even though I knew that Kia would be manic on the first day. I had already sat in the Kia and spend some time in the stationary GTX+ behind the showroom a few days back.
The reason that I am writing this post in this thread instead of Kia, as I feel the post is trying to compare MG than Kia. Subsequent to visiting Kia in the manic crowd, we visited MG just across the road and decided once again to take a longish test drive of the Hector DCT. I am eagerly awaiting to drive the Kia as well this week.
Comparison Hector vs Seltos:
1. Hector is a whole size bigger, both inside and out. Even with the black interiors it looks far more airy than the creme coloured Seltos. I would prefer a bigger car, even though both are only 5 seaters.
2. Paint quality of Kia and panel gaps are much better than MG.
3. Interior dashboard design, I prefer the minimalism of MG and also the drama of the large portrait screen. It is far more colourful and intuitive (but laggy also) than Kia's.
4. The leatherette quality in Kia and the seat design, seemed to be more premium in Kia. Lighter colour does help.
5. While I am yet to TD Kia, I prefer (some) height/commanding driving position in SUVs and would really like to test Kia soon on this, with seating position and visibility (quite a number of people have complaint about the lack of visibility in Seltos owing to the big screen placement)
6. The Sunroof in Kia is a joke and I would rather not have it. It further eats up the headroom, which is at a huge premium both in front and back. Most tall rear passengers will complaint. No complaints in the MG whatsoever, the sheer availability of space gives you a great luxury feeling. Although a big complaint now on MG, while my latest TD the sunroof reeked and made awful sounds, I could also see some watermarks on the blinds. When I asked the SA, he mentioned that the customers wanted to drive with it open in the rain and that has led to water seeping in, and thus the roof mechanism needs a spray lubrication to get rid of the noises. I could see the sense in his argument, but also felt are these this sensitive to a little rain?

Is this a common occurrence in other Sunroof cars, do they also need constant lubrication?
7. I could tell that the TD cars at MG were not being handled well or maintained as all 3 of them now had small scrapes. Also the DCT had moisture in one of the headlights (I tried to see if there was any external damage but I couldn't and this got me worried again!) not sure what was the reason for this. The SA also had no clue and blamed that it must have been bumped or scraped.
8. The music system in MG (infinity) is much better (8 speakers + subwoofer and amp), while Kia (Bose) makes do with 8 including the front central speaker and the sub.
9. The screen may not be most responsive and the lack of any physical buttons may be not good to operate while driving, but the voice commands work like a charm in the MG. Although, it works when you don't want it to as well (this happened twice in the 20km drive, although our discussion was involving cars only so the context for MG was there to interrupt).Don't know if this would be annoying in everyday life. Although, the same Hello MG.. has my daughter simply gaga over it, and the big sunroof and screen. She told her choice is only MG, she is just 3!
10. Suspension, power and handling. I was fairly satisfied and happy with my 3rd TD in MG. The refinement of the petrol is also very satisfying, coupled with the commanding ride height and good all round visibility. While, Kia would in my view be very soft, as I could see the rear suspension almost bottom-out with full load.
11. Mileage - I drive close to 70km daily, which is largely b2b but around 20km of highway (nh8), so this is important to me, however, I am also well aware of the class of cars that I am looking at and my expectations are reasonable. For the 3rd time now, I drove MG 10+km and in near peak city traffic with 5 onboard and each time I could manage a 11+kmpl (and yes the 1st km does start from 13kmpl, and I countered that in in my calculations). I however, am now contemplating looking at a diesel CVT Seltos as Hyundai petrols are notorious for their mileage, while their diesel are extremely refined. Also as the HTX+ CVT (other than the 4 airbags and equipment) seems to be slightly better equipped than the GTX DCT, while I am guessing both will be nearly equally priced.
12. Safety- MG will have Kia licked here both with the quality of sheet metal and the plethora of safety kit, simply missing on the autos in Kia. Also the auto e-brake is great to have in the MG and will sorely be missed.
13. AC (yes we live in Delhi) - I somehow in my latest TD felt that AC may be an issue with MG for the amount of glass area. Not sure if this was the case with this TD vehicle as prior to this, I had not experienced this as an issue. However, Kia with the ventilated seats, UV glass, rear sunshades and the overall smaller cabin area would be better IMO. Although the lack of physical air flow control for the rear is outrageous.
14. Durability and how would they be to live with? Well while MG has sealed it by covering all through their shield program, and it doesn't bother me too much if these early cars have some niggles which are promptly rectified by them (same was the case in my just launched XUV), but the recent videos of new cars breaking down, the Chinese heritage and my experience with the headlight and sunroof has made me cautious and second guess. While Kia will come with a similarly shitty and annoying Hyundai ASS, at least till the media drives and TDs are not out there is no one questioning these parameters.
So all in all, I am more confused than ever and in need of some serious guidance

. I never quite liked the CSUV segment, however, my brain keeps rationalising why not? and that it the reason for me Kia is entering the fray, else was not keen. and I still like the MG as it just brings much more to the table (for me) than the Kia and feels like an upgrade, which Kia (once the initial euphoria dies down will not)
Could someone please tell me are my apprehensions misplaced with the Hector, and should I just go with it? or would Kia be a more sensible choice. Any ideas when are the media drives happening for the Kia? and when can we expect the TBhp review for both?
