Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongturn Well you are selectively targeting specific points and being rude in your response, that's says a lot about what your thoughts actually are in this perspective. |
So I tell you to ahead and follow your beliefs as long as you like and you think I am being rude somehow. I don't get it. If you are so sensitive to any argument that goes against your belief system then why spout it on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongturn Ayurveda can cure and Yoga is a form of exercise that makes you physically healthy and both have substantial success in their fields to justify their existence. Please do the needful research before defaming an entire institution just because it's repulsive to your beliefs. Can't spoon-feed you on every damn subject you don't care enough to give an understanding to. If you couldn't see how I related them to coronavirus, read again. Your arguments suggests you think Ayurveda is quackery and Yoga is an elaborate sham. |
Nope, I never said that Ayurveda is quakery or Yoga is a sham.
I only pointed out that your believing in something doesn't make it true.
If there is a cure in Ayurveda for coronavirus it needs to be
scientifically validated. Somehow this point seems to be have gone over your head.
Otherwise how do you explain this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JithinR I don't care if the cure comes from some old text (from any bygone civilization) or from a modern laboratory as long as it's shown to be scientifically valid |
Also, please try to understand that the
burden of proof is always on the guy making the argument. If your argument is that Ayurveda has a cure for any disease then you have to provide the proof (or spoon feed as you like to call it).
That is how the 'Burden of Proof' works. This is something that the scientific community understands which you seem to dislike or not grasp as of yet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongturn Difference is clear as day, why did you bring in the other one then? I very well know the difference, but as usual you specifically want to target it like that, deliberately trying to manipulate the argument. Preventing handshakes is a cure in itself as it would stop the transfer of coronavirus. In this context prevention is cure itself, as no cure exists as of now. |
Dude, if you are going to make up your own rules for the English language then you are going to find it difficult to hold a discussion with most of the English speaking human race.
The phrase is 'Prevention is better than cure'. You can't just modify it to suit your needs. Also, it still seems that you don't understand the meaning of the word 'Cure'.
'Prevention is Cure'...
Amazing. If you prevented the damn infection from happening what you are going to cure. See, this is why you don't make up rules of grammar in your head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongturn I said "I believe there is a cure for this virus in Ayurveda too" and that was said in relation to the Tibetan medicine, but as usual you selectively targeted that one line, rephrased it and manipulated the meaning.
If you want me to explain every thing in the simplest possible manner cause you can't comprehend what a simple sentence wants to imply, please ignore my posts. Please ignore them anyways as you will not accept any valid arguments put forth as it's against what you believe, hence the rude replies. It's no use reasoning with you, can't keep banging my head against a wall |
Again, the 'Burden of Proof' is on you. You made the argument. Please stop calling it a valid argument ..atleast till you are capable of backing it up.
Yes, try banging your head on the wall and see if that helps.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongturn If you think ayurveda and yoga are pure fantasies and exist only in beliefs of a community, keep holding on to that thought. Nobody cares. |
So my statement literally states in plain and simple English that I would accept a cure from any traditional form of medicine or a modern one as long as it is scientifically valid and you then accuse me of thinking Ayurveda is pure fantasy.
It is difficult to hold an argument if you fail at comprehending the meaning of most of other guy's statements.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrongturn Stereotyping are we? So people who believe in ayurveda, yoga, Indian culture and traditions are backward, illiterate, stupid, idiot, yada yada, that's what I thought your humble opinion would be |
Nope, my statement only meant that people who put a god's Idiol on the dashboard and then refuse to put on the seat belt are relying on their belief system to keep them safe rather than
something that is statistically proven to reduce the chance of fatalities in car crashes.
This was to be taken in the context of the rest of my argument.
That something being proved as scientifically valid will hold more weight in real life than someone beliefs.
However, at this point I realize that you seem to struggle to understand the basic point that multiple people are trying to make so I understand your confusion here.