Quote:
Originally Posted by kch82 I have been researching on the Cruze AT quite religiously for the past few weeks. But for the past 2-3 days I have been reading many posts on the so expensive A.S.S. I am just shocked to read the mandatory "check up" after every 5000 km, which itself is very expensive. Then the brake pads need change every 15000km which in itself puts you back by many 5 digits. I am just shocked that in today's time when all automobile companies are trying to give more hassle free cars, GM is making cars on service models dating to the 90's. What is more amusing that despite such major service issues, many swear by this car. This makes me wonder whether these disastrous service stories are true ? I am sure no one would want to spend thousands of rupees at regular interval in the name of A.S.S. ?
I was considering the Cruze AT (facelift/engine upgrade) but I am in serious doubts. I preferred the Cruze AT over the Laura AT and Jetta AT because it is cheaper by a few lacs. But if I land up paying so much in A.S.S, then I guess such a purchase will be "penny wise pound foolish".
My requirements for a car are- diesel, AT and exciting looks. Till now Cruze AT was fitting the bill considering the price tag.
Can someone advise me what to do ? I am in a fix. I do not want a car that sucks my bank balance dry on A.S.S. At the same time the Jetta (my second choice) is out of my budget by a few lacs. Also VW and Skoda have equal horror A.S.S stories !!!
Will appreciate some genuine and unbiased advice from all users and experts here.
Thanks. |
Hello kch82,
Well, I have recently purchased a Chevrolet Cruze LTZ A/T in Sand Drift Grey Colour, it has clocked 4000kms within 2 months. I was in the same dilemma as you are in right now. I was looking for a replacement to my 5 year old Honda Civic A/T, with the petrol prices reaching sky-heights had to consider a diesel and an automatic was a primary requirement for ease of city use and that of driving for my mother and sister.
Decided to go for the on-going model as I was unsure of the arrival of the face-lift and I needed a car soon enough, the Civic was really in bad shape and the forever rising petrol costs were just making things worse. I do prefer the grill on the existing cruze than what is on the facelift.
Well even I was well-aware of the occasional instance of horrid A.S.S by Chevy but it didn't bother me too much as much as the Skoda's did so I was well away from the Laura, apart from the family acceptance aspect of the brand. Now that this thread is up lets see how many Cruze BHP-ian owners are subjected to this kind of A.S.S. Hoping not to be one of them, only time will tell. However I have opted for the CPCO package for which I payed an additional Rs.30,000/- which offers you complete cover of durables as well (except tyres & battery) for 3 years/45,000kms.
It was a tough call between the Jetta and the Cruze. And sometimes I do think what would life be like with the Jetta. But hey, life sometimes does seem greener on the other side. I'll give you a quick comparo in my opinion:
Engine:
The engine on the Cruze is really a beast, once the turbo comes in the acceleration pushes you back into the seat with a 'wooosh'. It has a very prominent turbo-sound (which I love
). The power delivery on the Jetta is far more linear in comparison. The Jetta redlines at 5,000rpm while the Cruze redlines at 4,500rpm.
Gearbox:
The Jetta has a beautiful DSG gearbox on offer. Shift-times are lightning quick and seamless. The Jetta maybe down on power by 10bhp on paper (more-like 23bhp post face-lift), but the gear box keeps it on the power better unlike the A/T in the Cruze which is a conventional 6-speed set up. During indecicive acceleration moments you really do feel the gearbox struggle to find a cog, the shift times are not as quick and you feel every gearchange. The paddle-shifters on the Jetta are far more intuitive to use and better than the slide out sequential +/- gear change on the Cruze. I reckon the DSG will be more fuel-efficient too.
Interior:
The cabin of the Jetta reeks quality and typical German-ness. Everything is very well screwed together, simple and tight. Its quite the contrary in the Cruze, the plastics are hard, it doesn't feel as well-screwed together as the Jetta does but that said the centre console on the Cruze is pretty flamboyant and looks like something straight out of a fashion couture catalog.
As Tanvir very rightly mentioned in the official review. Sometimes its not always a good idea to let the designer take charge of the interior than the engineer.
Features:
This is where the Cruze gets an edge over the Jetta. Electric Sun-roof, Automatic Climate Control, Keyless Entry & Go (Push-start), Proper USB-in (as far as I know, the Jetta just gets an iPod cable and an unusual SD-slot), Bluetooth Audio.
The Jetta gets Driver electric seat adjust which IMO is useless without memory function and a Touch-screen ICE over the Cruze that too will change with the upcomming facelift. No climate control is a real bummer in a 20L on-road sedan.
The reason I decided on the Cruze was because I like a bit of madness to my car, the power delivery nature of the car excites me more. The Cruze is a stunning looker with its coupe like head-swoop, muscular edges. The plethora of additional equipment over the almost 3.5 Lakh Rupee more expensive Jetta just did it for me.
Anyway, hope this post helped.
Paging all BHP-ian Cruze owners to share their A.S.S experience, I shall update this thread with my due 5,000kms service which is soon approaching.
Regards,