I know that a lot of BHPians are passionate about the Safari, and was prepared for the backlash.
Though disappointed, I just couldn't deselect it. Hence, I took another test drive today to avoid being Placebo'd by the Tuscon. Notes from this test drive:
I apologise the poor image quality. I'm not that good with the camera.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pjbiju
Any specific examples that you noticed? Are they trims that the user would often interact with? Are they at highly visible areas? Do they hamper working of something inside the vehicle?
|
Notice the gap in the plastic trim holding the head-liner on the D-Pillar.
The rubber beading on the top right corner of the window doesn't fit flush.
People might call me pedantic, but I can't accept that on a 28L vehicle.
Quote:
Which switches? Do you feel they could easily break or fail? Why did you feel so? |
In the following video notice the cheap quality of the switch for the rear reading lamp
The following is the same switch for the rear reading lamp of my Crysta - notice the quality and the amount of damping
Quote:
What was the issue with the steering? What do you mean by not calibrated well? Was it too heavy, requiring more effort? Was it too sensitive, making a vehicle direction change even at the slightest input? At what speeds did you notice these issues? |
I felt that the steering was too sensitive at high speeds - as noted in the official review. Unlike the official review, I didn't find it heavy at crawling speeds - I actually liked it. However, at city speeds, I felt some strange disconnect between the steering input and the actual degree that the vehicle turned. I somehow didn't feel that the turn angle was proportional to the input. All these are certainly not deal breakers, and easy to get used to.
Quote:
What was the brake noise? Pads rubbing against the disc or something else? Was the noise not there while braking at higher speeds?
|
The noise was at crawling speeds under steady constant braking. I couldn't identify the source of the noise, but it was like a grr... my guess is a worn-out brake pad. Didn't hear anything at higher speeds. I rather liked the performance of the brakes.
Quote:
When you say atrocious build quality what exactly are you referring to? The basic structure of the vehicle or the interior parts? Is the sheet metal/steel used for the body not strong enough? Are the welds/joints between panels not having good strength or is not proper?
By "heft" you are referring to the weight of the door. How did you actually feel or measure the weight of the door when the weight is on the hinges? By the force needed to move the door on the hinges or by the sound of the door shutting? Is the rear door of the S-Cross very light? Asking this since you made the comparison to the S-cross doors.
Again how did you find that the boot door is a tin can? By feeling the weight or by flexing the boot door panels? |
My observation is based on the sound with which the door shuts.
This is my 2018 Creta
And this is the Safari
Not much difference as far as I could tell. Ditto for the boot. Tried flexing the panels, they did not budge excessively.
Quote:
1.5 lakh kilometers would roughly be 10 years of usage for most people. I do not know how one can judge if something will last that long or fail by just looking at something. A big part of how long something will last depends on the conditions of usage (roads, load carried and driving characteristics like speed, acceleration, braking etc.). Of course if there are a lot of examples of most of Tata cars falling apart within a certain period or by a certain number of kilometers, we can assume, that it could be true of this car as well unless proved otherwise. |
Some more videos on interior quality:
The rear door bin isn't robust at all:
Ditto for the tray like thing on the door
Here's a shot if the cheap fabric on the rear armrest
Conclusion
As I mentioned earlier, Safari is a competent package which is let down by poor material and build quality (A.K.A how well pieces are put together).
To me, the Tucson feels 30% better compared to the Gold variant (~10% difference in price). However, more entry level variants of the Safari make more financial sense. To be honest, the Tucson is from a higher category than the entry models of the Safari - so it is somewhat expected to be superior.