The discontinued model bit shouldn't be too much of an issue, since it's simply a discontinued variant (not a model) - with pretty much all parts available in other continuing variants (other than the MT gearbox).
So there's a chance that you might have to wait a bit when it's time for a clutch replacement - it's a CKD after all.
But Ford seem to be really good at managing stuff for Endeavour customers, so you can hope they either maintain some sort of an inventory at Chennai, or move things quickly from Thailand on order.
Anumod's would be the reply to wait for, I suppose - he might've inquiried about this and/or come up with a contingency plan for this. And then there are others who should be able to give you a good idea of standard practices in such cases (and specific to Ford in this case too) - in my book, a big reason for this vehicle being at the top of my shortlist is that some of the most helpful and well informed people seem to have bought it.
That said, the price is far too high - not a good deal IMO. It sounds like it's in good condition given how much you liked it (even though the vehicle is such that 20k wouldn't have aged it at all) - but bear in mind that this model was overpriced in its positioning over the 2.2 Tend AT 4x2 when it was on sale - the differential was a little too steep given the -AT +4x4 equation. Do not align the depreciation to that price IMO.
Also, it's a question of looking at a discontinued version that sold very few numbers as rare and therefore sort after, or as not much in demand. I assume that's how the seller would want to look at it, but don't let the deal go down like that - you may get a better price even after the lowering that should be done once the seller calculated depreciation more sensibly.
That said, it's an excellent opportunity to get a 4x4 MT that isn't a guzzler - you should try your best to not pass up on it if suits your needs. But at this price? Absolutely not a good deal.
Wish Ford offered a 3.2 4x4 MT Titanium.
Quote:
Originally Posted by krishsreedharan Hi All!
Just got my Endeavour through its 10k service at Rajshree Ford yesterday. One thing I noticed was that the existing thickness of the brake pads was 10.1mm on the fronts and only 5.3 on the rears.
It is my understanding that in an SUV the size of the Endeavour, with its front biased weight, the rears had much less work to do than the front pads. however, the wear indicates otherwise.
I would like to hear from fellow Endeavour owners on their experiences on this count. Other than this, the total bill was a very reasonable Rs. 5,100 odd inclusive of all taxes.
Cheers!
Krish |
As I've said above, this is the best thread I've come across at least - you would've found much of the information specific to brake pad life on the Endeavour, if you searched with specific terms.
Unfortunately, in my notes, I haven't marked the page number where the brake pad issues were discussed, but that's probably because I remember the thing well enough and/or sorted it out. With my sketchy credentials out of the way, let me summarise it for you:
For many, brake pads were wearing out pretty quickly - around 20k, which is isn't good enough. For some they lasted de riguer - which was discussed as 30k to 50k IIRC.
I don't remember causes etc being discussed much, other than stopping in D with brakes pressed.
If you do a subsequent search with the right search terms, and find something else, do update here. That said, here's what I read up/saw to put the issue out of my mind, and what I have to reply specifically to what you've said:
1. Rear brakes would wear more as in normal mode 60% of the power is supplied to the rear wheels - the brakes are fighting the engine harder. The TC AT would also be a factor here.
2. This would be exacerbated if you spend extended periods stopped in D with your foot on the brake.
3. The vehicle does have heavy components at the front (the engine), and the weight does shift forward when breaking for all vehicles (inertia), and hence they have bigger brakes upfront - but given the increased work for the rear brakes with the power distribution and the TC AT, the rear brakes will wear out first for this vehicle.
My advice, shift out of D as much as possible for all pauses - even though many argue it isn't an issue in modern ATs, even TCs.
Pressed for time by now at this point of the post. Will elaborate later if necessary - the foot brake + D mode for pausing is good/bad is indeed a contentious point for many.