"Adipurush" on Netflix and Amazon Prime: Unveiling the Myth!
I thoroughly enjoyed streaming "Adipurush" at home on OTT. Having watched it in theaters and experiencing a mid-movie slumber (blame the late-night showtime, NOT because the film was bad), I embarked on a mission to screen it for Dad and the rest of the family who had missed the theatrical run. Plus, I aimed to fill in the gaps from my theatrical nap and catch any missed plot twists.
We kicked off our viewing experience with the regional language version on Amazon Prime. The movie commenced with an amazing song during the opening credits – a tune that had the same awe-inspiring effect in theaters. Personally, I found the music to be the film's standout feature, if not its sole highlight. Upon Dad's request, we switched to the Hindi version on Netflix, as the Malayalam lyrics and dialogues seemed a bit out of place. Grandma joined us a few minutes later, only to fire off a genuine but comical query: "Is this a cartoon(animation) movie?" I got a flashback - a few years ago she asked a similar question when she joined us while watching TINTIN(2011) on TV. She found it hard to believe that it was a 3D animation film and not a movie with actual actors and actual sets. Apparently, poor old grandma still grapples with distinguishing animation from reality, NOT that this movie was bad. It took her a moment to realize that Saif was Raavan while we watched the Hindi version on Netflix. She inquired why he had a peculiar gait(Saif was walking like Sanjay Dutt on drugs. Hmm... Wait, what?), showcasing her knack for spotting even the tiniest details. During the Lanka scenes, she even asked me to increase the brightness, anticipating a golden-hued Lanka. However, she discontinued her viewing journey sometime after we switched to Hindi. But it's more of a linguistic preference, NOT that the movie was bad.
In other news, my Dad was battling sleep troubles after a surgery. The movie seemed to serve as a lullaby for him as well as he dozed off midway. Upon waking up, I proposed continuing the movie. In response, he folded his hands and gestured for us to switch to something else. This was considering he couldn't speak much, NOT that the movie was bad.
I had encountered reviews suggesting that Prabhas was in his Bahubali mode. My perspective differed. With the expressions he gave, I couldn't decide if he was trying to save Sita or just remembering ‘Where have I kept my car keys?’ or ‘Did I switch off the fans while before leaving the house?’. I even pondered if, given Prabhas' current look, he might have been a better fit for the Raavan role. Meanwhile, Sunny Singh, who previously did some lovable characters, seemed to have taken acting cues from the same school from where Alia Bhatt took training for "Brahmastra." It was as if they were reading the lines from a teleprompter. And let's not forget the VFX, which were utterly absurd given the claimed budget. The IT department might want to audit the producers' books for this one. The fight between Sugreev and Bali prompted grandma to make the question mentioned earlier. She cannot be blamed, my Tetris handheld game had more convincing VFX.
Comparatively, "Brahmastra", though far from a cinematic masterpiece, boasted outstanding VFX, overshadowing its acting and dialogue-related shortcomings. Interestingly, some '90s Indian TV series featured superior VFX than "Adipurush". Perhaps it's time for a special therapy session for viewers like me who dared to experience this madness in theaters. While I appreciate creative liberties in filmmaking, and I can understand the changes w.r.t fashion and dialogues, this film's abysmal execution transcends that understanding. The cinematic catastrophe is only amplified when witnessed on TV. At least in theaters, the music provided a hint of solace. After this escapade, I've decided not to watch any T-Series offerings in Theatres for the near future.
The audience reaction after watching it in theatres.
